Paper · 2011 · Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society

Evaluation of Freeze Protection Methods for Strawberry Production in Florida

Bielinski M. Santos; David Moore; Teresa P. Salamé-Donoso; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted to compare the performance of freeze protection methods on strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) growth and yields. Treatments consisted of using: a) 4.5 gal/min sprinkler heads (control), b) 3.5 gal/min sprinkler heads, c)heavy row covers on the crop canopy (0.9 oz/yd2), d) heavy row covers on 1.5-ft high minitunnel hoops, e) light row covers on the crop canopy (0.6 oz/yd2), f) light row covers on 1.5-ft-high minitunnel hoops, and g) 16-ft high tunnels. The minimum air temperature without freeze protection practices in the field during the season was 21 °F, but the minimum temperature directly above the crop canopy was 34 °F in covered plots regardless of the cover weight and the use of hoops and 33 °F inside the high tunnels. No water was needed in plots with row covers and inside high tunnels, whereas approximately 39 acre-inch/acre of water were needed in the control plots. Using non-irrigation alternatives for freeze protection resulted in the highest early and total fruit weights, where total yields in plots treated with these non-irrigation alternatives ranged between 15.1 and 15.4 ton/acre while there was approximately a 20% fruit weight decline when sprinkler irrigation was utilized, regardless of the output volume.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-irrigation freeze protection alternatives gave the highest early and total fruit weights compared with sprinkler irrigation.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
non-irrigation alternativese6
Outcome
early and total fruit weightse6
Direction
higheste6
Comparator
sprinkler irrigatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“freeze protection methods on strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) growth and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–136 · show in text ↑
e6

“Using non-irrigation alternatives for freeze protection resulted in the highest early and total fruit weights, where total yields in plots treated with these non-irrigation alternatives ranged between 15.1 and 15.4 ton/acre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1136 · show in text ↑
e7

“there was approximately a 20% fruit weight decline when sprinkler irrigation was utilized, regardless of the output volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1265 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yields under non-irrigation alternatives ranged between 15.1 and 15.4 ton/acre.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
non-irrigation alternativese6
Outcome
total yieldse6
Value
15.1 and 15.4 ton/acree6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“freeze protection methods on strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) growth and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–136 · show in text ↑
e6

“Using non-irrigation alternatives for freeze protection resulted in the highest early and total fruit weights, where total yields in plots treated with these non-irrigation alternatives ranged between 15.1 and 15.4 ton/acre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation reduced fruit weight by about 20% regardless of output volume.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
sprinkler irrigatione7
Outcome
fruit weighte7
Direction
declinee7
Value
20%e7
Qualifier
regardless of the output volumee7
Comparator
non-irrigation alternativese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“freeze protection methods on strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) growth and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–136 · show in text ↑
e6

“Using non-irrigation alternatives for freeze protection resulted in the highest early and total fruit weights, where total yields in plots treated with these non-irrigation alternatives ranged between 15.1 and 15.4 ton/acre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1136 · show in text ↑
e7

“there was approximately a 20% fruit weight decline when sprinkler irrigation was utilized, regardless of the output volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row covers and high tunnels needed no irrigation water, compared with about 39 acre-inch/acre in control plots.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
row covers and inside high tunnelse5
Outcome
watere5
Direction
No water was needede5
Qualifier
approximately 39 acre-inch/acre of watere5
Comparator
control plotse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“freeze protection methods on strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) growth and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–136 · show in text ↑
e5

“No water was needed in plots with row covers and inside high tunnels, whereas approximately 39 acre-inch/acre of water were needed in the control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–911 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under covered plots the minimum temperature directly above the crop canopy was 34 °F.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
covered plotse3
Outcome
minimum temperature directly above the crop canopye3
Value
34 °Fe3
Qualifier
regardless of the cover weight and the use of hoopse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“freeze protection methods on strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) growth and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–136 · show in text ↑
e3

“the minimum temperature directly above the crop canopy was 34 °F in covered plots regardless of the cover weight and the use of hoops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–724 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inside the high tunnels the minimum temperature was 33 °F.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
high tunnelse4
Outcome
minimum temperaturee3
Value
33 °Fe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“freeze protection methods on strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) growth and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–136 · show in text ↑
e3

“the minimum temperature directly above the crop canopy was 34 °F in covered plots regardless of the cover weight and the use of hoops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–724 · show in text ↑
e4

“33 °F inside the high tunnels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without freeze protection practices the minimum air temperature in the field was 21 °F.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
without freeze protection practicese2
Outcome
minimum air temperaturee2
Value
21 °Fe2
Setting
in the field during the seasone2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“freeze protection methods on strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) growth and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“The minimum air temperature without freeze protection practices in the field during the season was 21 °F”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–585 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.