Paper · 2015 · Agricultural Water Management

Matric potential-based irrigation management of field-grown strawberry: Effects on yield and water use efficiency

Guillaume Létourneau; J. Caron; L. Anderson; et al.

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
75
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Effective and adapted criteria for irrigation scheduling are required to improve yield and water use efficiency (WUE) and reduce the environmental impacts associated with water and nutrients losses by runoff and leaching. In this study, field-scale experiments were conducted at four commercial strawberry production sites with contrasting soil and climatic conditions. Within each site, the influence of different soil matric potential-based irrigation thresholds (IT) on yield and WUE was evaluated. Matric potential-based irrigation management was also compared with common irrigation practices used by producers in each site's respective areas. At Site 1 (silty clay loam; humid continental (Dfb) climate), an IT of −15 kPa improved yields by 6.2% without any additional use of water relative to common irrigation practices. At Site 2, with similar soil and climatic conditions, the irrigation treatments did not affect yield and the matric potential-based management decreased WUE relative to common practices. However, the results suggested that maintaining the soil matric potential lower than −9 kPa could induce stressing conditions for the plants. At Site 3 (sandy loam; Mediterranean (Cs) climate), the best yield and WUE were obtained with an IT of −8 kPa and suggested that WUE could be further improved by implementing high-frequency irrigation. At Site 4 (clay loam; Mediterranean (Cs) climate), results suggested that an IT between −10 and −15 kPa could optimize yield and WUE, and matric potential-based irrigation considerably reduced leaching under the root zone relative to common practices. Considering the results from all sites, an IT of −10 kPa appears to be adequate as a starting point for further optimizing irrigation under most field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Site 1, a −15 kPa threshold improved strawberry yield by 6.2% against common practice.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
IT of −15 kPae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
6.2%e0
Comparator
common irrigation practicese0
Setting
Site 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Site 1 (silty clay loam; humid continental (Dfb) climate), an IT of −15 kPa improved yields by 6.2% without any additional use of water relative to common irrigation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Site 1, a −15 kPa threshold used no extra water relative to common practice.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
IT of −15 kPae0
Outcome
use of watere0
Direction
without any additionale0
Comparator
common irrigation practicese0
Setting
Site 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an IT of −15 kPa improved yields by 6.2% without any additional use of water relative to common irrigation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–828 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Site 1 (silty clay loam; humid continental (Dfb) climate), an IT of −15 kPa improved yields by 6.2% without any additional use of water relative to common irrigation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Site 2, irrigation treatments did not affect strawberry yield.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
Site 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Site 2, with similar soil and climatic conditions, the irrigation treatments did not affect yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Site 2, matric-potential management decreased water use efficiency against common practice.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
matric potential-based managemente0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
common practicese0
Setting
Site 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the matric potential-based management decreased WUE relative to common practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Site 2, with similar soil and climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maintaining matric potential below −9 kPa could stress plants at Site 2.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
soil matric potential lower than −9 kPae0
Outcome
stressing conditions for the plantse0
Setting
Site 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintaining the soil matric potential lower than −9 kPa could induce stressing conditions for the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Site 2, with similar soil and climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Site 3, −8 kPa produced the best yield.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
IT of −8 kPae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beste0
Setting
Site 3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Site 3 (sandy loam; Mediterranean (Cs) climate), the best yield and WUE were obtained with an IT of −8 kPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Site 3, −8 kPa produced the best water use efficiency.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
IT of −8 kPae0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
beste0
Setting
Site 3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Site 3 (sandy loam; Mediterranean (Cs) climate), the best yield and WUE were obtained with an IT of −8 kPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At Site 3, high-frequency irrigation could further improve water use efficiency.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
high-frequency irrigatione0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE could be further improved by implementing high-frequency irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At Site 4, −10 to −15 kPa could optimize yield and water use efficiency.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
IT between −10 and −15 kPae0
Setting
Site 4e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an IT between −10 and −15 kPa could optimize yield and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1492 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Site 4 (clay loam; Mediterranean (Cs) climate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Site 4, matric-potential management reduced below-root-zone leaching against common practice.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
matric potential-based irrigatione0
Outcome
leaching under the root zonee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
common practicese0
Setting
Site 4e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“matric potential-based irrigation considerably reduced leaching under the root zone relative to common practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1611 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Site 4 (clay loam; Mediterranean (Cs) climate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Across sites, −10 kPa was suggested as a starting threshold for irrigation optimization.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
IT of −10 kPae0
Qualifier
under most field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an IT of −10 kPa appears to be adequate as a starting point for further optimizing irrigation under most field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1774 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–70 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · environment: emissions · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.