Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A four-fold reduction in the size of irrigation management zones had no effect on strawberry yield.

A claim from Irrigation Management Scale and Water Application Method to Improve Yield and Water Productivity of Field-Grown Strawberries · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A four-fold reduction in the size of irrigation management zones had no effect on strawberry yield.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
A four-fold reduction in the size of the irrigation management zonese3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
had no effecte3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In this study, a field-scale experiment was performed to evaluate the impacts of three irrigation management scales and a pulsed water application method on strawberry yield and water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–643
e3

“A four-fold reduction in the size of the irrigation management zones had no effect on yield and increased the water applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1241

Title

Irrigation Management Scale and Water Application Method to Improve Yield and Water Productivity of Field-Grown Strawberries

Guillaume Létourneau; Jean Caron Agronomy 2019. doi:10.3390/agronomy9060286

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-f80954e41b878634c324a2d816db085e820e09bc96edbd1a8f41ba062bf8f21c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.