Paper · 2019 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Propagation of Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce Vita by stenting and stem cutting methods in response to different concentrations of IBA

Pourghorban, Masoumeh; Khaghani, Shahab; Azadi, Pejman; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of different concentrations of Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) in propagation of Rosa hybrida L. cultivar Dolce Vita by stenting (cutting and grafting) and stem cutting methods in greenhouse conditions. Different concentrations of IBA (0, 1500, 3000 and 4500 mg/L) were considered on Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce Vita grafted onto Rosa hybrida L. ‘Natal Briar’ rootstock. Then, the stentings and stem cuttings were cultured in a cocopeat + perlite (in 1:1 ratio) medium under mist system. The research was conducted as a completely randomized design with three replications. The results suggested that all IBA treatments significantly increase rooting percentage compared with the control plants, and the highest specifications of roots and shoots were observed in 1500 mg/L IBA in both methods of propagation. The results approved the superiority of stem cutting in rooting. However, the higher content of chlorophyll a, b and total were obtained in stenting method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All IBA treatments significantly increased rose rooting percentage compared with control plants.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce VitaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
IBA treatmentse0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce Vita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“all IBA treatments significantly increase rooting percentage compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest root and shoot specifications occurred with 1500 mg/L IBA for both propagation methods.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce VitaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
1500 mg/L IBAe0
Outcome
specifications of roots and shootse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce Vita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest specifications of roots and shoots were observed in 1500 mg/L IBA in both methods of propagation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem cutting was superior to stenting for rooting.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce VitaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
stem cuttinge0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
stenting methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce Vita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“superiority of stem cutting in rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“stenting method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stenting gave higher chlorophyll a, b, and total content than stem cutting.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce VitaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
stenting methode0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll a, b and totale0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
stem cutting methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rosa hybrida L. cv. Dolce Vita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher content of chlorophyll a, b and total were obtained in stenting method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem cutting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–223 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pruning · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.