Paper · 2019 · Agronomy Journal

Assessment of Relative Potencies of Nitrogen Sources on Seedling Root Systems

Isaac J. Madsen; William L. Pan

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Banding of N fertilizers below the seed is a common practice in direct seeded wheat dominated dryland agricultural systems, yet the placement of fertilizer below the seed has been shown to decrease yields and damage the root system architecture (RSA) in canola ( Brassica napus ). However, there is a lack of understanding as to which rates and sources of fertilizers might be safe for seedling root systems. The goal of this study was to compare the effect of three different N sources over a gradient of application rates on canola RSA. The effect of the fertilizer band on RSA has previously been imaged using rhizobox methods. However, the research presented here describes a novel technique for comparing sources and rates simultaneously while using the existing imaging technology. Canola seedlings were exposed to increasing rates of urea, ammonium sulfate (AS), and urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) from 0 mg N cm –1 to 40 mg N cm –1 placed 50 mm below the seed row. Canola showed significant changes in RSA as a result of the increasing ammoniacal‐N fertilizer rate. Dose response curves were developed for urea, AS, and UAN, and median lethal doses (LD50s) for tap roots were estimated at 4.7, 9.7, and 20.6 mg N cm –1 , respectively. Comparisons between multiple measurements of the dose response curves revealed a consistent ranking of relative potencies among urea, AS, UAN (most to least toxic). Core Ideas New assay method for determining the relative potencies and safety ranges of different fertilizer sources as relates to roots system damage. Banded urea, ammonium sulfate, and urea ammonium nitrate N fertilizer sources all damage canola seedling root systems, but at differing rates. Dose response analysis was utilized to rank the relative potencies of ammoniacal‐N fertilizers from most toxic (urea) to least toxic (urea ammonium nitrate).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ammoniacal nitrogen fertilizer rates significantly changed canola root system architecture.

Treatment
increasing ammoniacal‐N fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
RSAe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Canola showed significant changes in RSA as a result of the increasing ammoniacal‐N fertilizer rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea tap-root LD50 was estimated at 4.7 mg N per cm.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
median lethal doses (LD50s) for tap rootse0
Value
4.7e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dose response curves were developed for urea, AS, and UAN, and median lethal doses (LD50s) for tap roots were estimated at 4.7, 9.7, and 20.6 mg N cm –1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canola seedlings were exposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate tap-root LD50 was estimated at 9.7 mg N per cm.

Treatment
ASe0
Outcome
median lethal doses (LD50s) for tap rootse0
Value
9.7e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dose response curves were developed for urea, AS, and UAN, and median lethal doses (LD50s) for tap roots were estimated at 4.7, 9.7, and 20.6 mg N cm –1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canola seedlings were exposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea ammonium nitrate tap-root LD50 was estimated at 20.6 mg N per cm.

Treatment
UANe0
Outcome
median lethal doses (LD50s) for tap rootse0
Value
20.6 mg N cm –1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dose response curves were developed for urea, AS, and UAN, and median lethal doses (LD50s) for tap roots were estimated at 4.7, 9.7, and 20.6 mg N cm –1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canola seedlings were exposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–817 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dose-response measurements consistently ranked urea most toxic, then AS, then UAN.

Outcome
consistent ranking of relative potenciese0
Qualifier
most to least toxice0
Comparator
urea, AS, UANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparisons between multiple measurements of the dose response curves revealed a consistent ranking of relative potencies among urea, AS, UAN (most to least toxic).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canola seedlings were exposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–817 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · pest · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 89 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.