Paper · 2019 · HortScience

Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Plant Growth-promoting Bacteria Alleviate Drought Stress in Walnut

Azadeh Behrooz; Kourosh Vahdati; Farhad Rejali; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
110
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the main constraints limiting worldwide crop production. Arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) and plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) such as Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillium lipofrum have been shown to alleviate drought stress effects. Therefore, the interaction effect of AM fungi [ Glomus mosseae , G. etunicatum , and a mix of these (G. mix), and PGPB bacteria ( Azotobacter chroococcum + Azospirillium lipofrum )] was investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions. Drought stress reduced growth (plant height, root length, number of leaves, and fresh weight) and leaf nutrient content (N, P, and Zn) significantly of walnut plants. In contrast, proline, total soluble sugar, starch peroxidase enzyme activity, and total phenolic content of walnut leaves increased under this stress. Application of fungi or bacteria, and especially their simultaneous use, alleviated the negative effects of drought stress on walnut seedlings. AM fungi and PGPB increased significantly the content of some metabolites, including total phenolic content, proline level, peroxidase activity, total soluble sugar, and starch content as well as peroxidase enzyme activity. This led to an increase in walnut plant growth under the drought stress condition. Among AM fungi, G. etunicatum was more effective in reducing drought stress symptoms than either G. mosseae or the G. mix of fungi. In conclusion, use of G. etunicatum , along with PGPB, can reduce negative effects of drought stress on walnut seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced plant height, root length and number of leaves of walnut seedlings compared with normal conditions.

Taxon
walnute0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
plant height, root length, number of leavese1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
normale0

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress reduced growth (plant height, root length, number of leaves, and fresh weight) and leaf nutrient content (N, P, and Zn) significantly of walnut plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced fresh weight of walnut seedlings compared with normal conditions.

Taxon
walnute0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
fresh weighte1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
normale0

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress reduced growth (plant height, root length, number of leaves, and fresh weight) and leaf nutrient content (N, P, and Zn) significantly of walnut plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf nutrient content of walnut seedlings compared with normal conditions.

Taxon
walnute0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf nutrient contente1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
N, P, and Zne1
Comparator
normale0

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress reduced growth (plant height, root length, number of leaves, and fresh weight) and leaf nutrient content (N, P, and Zn) significantly of walnut plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased proline and total soluble sugar in walnut leaves.

Taxon
walnute0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Organ / stage
walnut leavese2
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
proline, total soluble sugare2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
normale0

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e2

“proline, total soluble sugar, starch peroxidase enzyme activity, and total phenolic content of walnut leaves increased under this stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased total phenolic content in walnut leaves.

Taxon
walnute0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Organ / stage
walnut leavese2
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
total phenolic contente2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
normale0

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e2

“proline, total soluble sugar, starch peroxidase enzyme activity, and total phenolic content of walnut leaves increased under this stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased starch and peroxidase enzyme activity in walnut leaves.

Taxon
walnute0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Organ / stage
walnut leavese2
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
starch peroxidase enzyme activitye2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
normale0

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e2

“proline, total soluble sugar, starch peroxidase enzyme activity, and total phenolic content of walnut leaves increased under this stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi and PGPB significantly increased total phenolic content, proline level and peroxidase activity in walnut.

Taxon
walnute0
Treatment
AM fungi and PGPBe5
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae5symbiont
Second interactor
PGPBe5symbiont
Outcome
total phenolic content, proline level, peroxidase activitye5
Direction
increased significantlye5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e5

“AM fungi and PGPB increased significantly the content of some metabolites, including total phenolic content, proline level, peroxidase activity, total soluble sugar, and starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi and PGPB significantly increased total soluble sugar and starch content in walnut.

Taxon
walnute0
Treatment
AM fungi and PGPBe5
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae5symbiont
Second interactor
PGPBe5symbiont
Outcome
total soluble sugar, and starch contente5
Direction
increased significantlye5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e5

“AM fungi and PGPB increased significantly the content of some metabolites, including total phenolic content, proline level, peroxidase activity, total soluble sugar, and starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of fungi or bacteria increased walnut plant growth under drought stress.

Taxon
walnute0
Treatment
Application of fungi or bacteriae3
Outcome
plant growthe6
Direction
increasee6
Comparator
drought stress conditione6

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of fungi or bacteria, and especially their simultaneous use, alleviated the negative effects of drought stress on walnut seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1014 · show in text ↑
e6

“This led to an increase in walnut plant growth under the drought stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. etunicatum was more effective than G. mosseae or the G. mix of fungi in reducing drought stress symptoms in walnut.

Taxon
walnute0
Treatment
G. etunicatume4
Interactor
G. etunicatume4symbiont
Outcome
drought stress symptomse4
Direction
more effectivee4
Comparator
G. mosseae or the G. mix of fungie4

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e4

“Among AM fungi, G. etunicatum was more effective in reducing drought stress symptoms than either G. mosseae or the G. mix of fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1453 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Use of G. etunicatum with PGPB is recommended for walnut seedlings to reduce negative effects of drought.

Taxon
walnute0
Outcome
negative effects of drought stress on walnut seedlingse7

Verbatim

e0

“investigated in 1-year-old walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler) under normal and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–552 · show in text ↑
e7

“can reduce negative effects of drought stress on walnut seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1575 · show in text ↑

drought · soil: biology · Juglans (walnuts)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · growth · Juglans (walnuts)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Juglans (walnuts)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · growth · Juglans (walnuts)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.