Paper · 2019 · Agronomía Colombiana

Phosphate fertilization on soils with improved fertility in the Brazilian Cerrado

Luís Marcelo Mariussi; Rubson Da Costa Leite; Gilson Araújo de Freitas; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The practices of soil amendment and fertilization carried out over the years have allowed the improvement of the fertility in some of them in the Brazilian soils. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of soybean in response to phosphate fertilization in soil with improved fertility. The research was carried out during the 2015-2016 harvest season in a dry-land area in the municipality of São Desidério, Bahia. The experiment was arranged in randomized blocks, with five treatments and four replicates. Treatments were composed by doses of phosphate fertilizer (0, 70, 140, 210 and 280 kg P2O5 ha-1). The following variables were evaluated: plant height, height of insertion of the first pod, number of stems per plant, number of pods per plant, thousand grain weight, productivity, and the analysis of macro and micronutrients in the leaf. Soybean plants did not respond to phosphorus applied to soil with built fertility. Under the conditions of this study, phosphorus fertilization in soil with improved fertility did not promote productivity. Although the plants did not respond to foliar macro and micronutrients as a function of phosphate fertilization, there was no reduction of these in response to high doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean plants did not respond to applied phosphorus on built-fertility soil.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
phosphorus applied to soil with built fertilitye0
Outcome
Soybean plants did not responde0
Direction
did not responde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean plants did not respond to phosphorus applied to soil with built fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization did not raise soybean productivity on improved-fertility soil.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
phosphorus fertilization in soil with improved fertilitye0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
did not promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus fertilization in soil with improved fertility did not promote productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate fertilization did not change foliar macro- and micronutrients.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
phosphate fertilizatione0
Outcome
foliar macro and micronutrientse0
Direction
did not responde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plants did not respond to foliar macro and micronutrients as a function of phosphate fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1182 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High phosphate doses did not reduce foliar macro- and micronutrients.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
high dosese0
Outcome
foliar macro and micronutrientse1
Direction
no reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no reduction of these in response to high doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1241 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar macro and micronutrients as a function of phosphate fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1182 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–879 · show in text ↑

phosphate · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 69 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,021 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.