Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during 2011–12 and 2012–13 at Morena, Madhya Pradesh, to study the ef fect of nutrition management, and methods and scheduling of irrigation on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence. An irrigation at 0.6 irrigation water:cumulative pan evaporation (IW:CPE) ratio resulted in significantly higher growth, yield attributes, seed yield, economic benefits and water pro ductivity of soybean compared with 0.4 and 0.8 IW:CPE. Similarly, an irrigation at 0.4 IW:CPE ratio significantly in fluenced the yield-attributing characters, seed and straw yields, economic benefits and water productivity of chickpea compared with 0.6 and 0.8 IW:CPE ratios, whereas height and number of branches increased with in creasing IW:CPE ratio. Sprinkler irrigation resulted in significantly higher growth and yield attributes, seed and straw yields, economic benefits and water productivity of both the crops. The irrigation at 0.6 IW:CPE ratio showed 51.3% and 39.0% higher seed of soybean over 0.4 and 0.8 IW:CPE ratio, whereas 0.4 IW:CPE of irrigation yielded 14.5% and 32.5% higher seed of chickpea compared with 0.6 and 0.8 IW:CPE. Mean response of sprinkler irriga tion was recorded 8.3% in soybean and 11.7% in chickpea higher seed yield over check basin irrigation. Likewise, increases in growth and yield attributes, seed yield, water productivity and protein production of soybean and chickpea were noticed with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + 2.5 t FYM/ha compared with other nutrition treatments. Addition of 75% RDF + 2.5 t FYM/ha also achieved higher system productivity, net profit and production and economic efficacy. After harvesting of the second crop of chickpea, maximum availability of N, P, K and S was recorded under 0.4 IW:CPE ratio, sprinkler irrigation and application of 75% RDF + 2.5 t FYM/ha compared to other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.6 IW:CPE gave higher soybean growth, yield attributes, seed yield, economic benefits, and water productivity than 0.4 and 0.8.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- 0.6 irrigation water:cumulative pan evaporation (IW:CPE) ratioe0
- Outcome
- growth, yield attributes, seed yield, economic benefits and water pro ductivitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 0.4 and 0.8 IW:CPEe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An irrigation at 0.6 irrigation water:cumulative pan evaporation (IW:CPE) ratio resulted in significantly higher growth, yield attributes, seed yield, economic benefits and water pro ductivity of soybean compared with 0.4 and 0.8 IW:CPE.”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.4 IW:CPE improved chickpea yield traits, seed and straw yield, economics, and water productivity over 0.6 and 0.8.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- 0.4 IW:CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- yield-attributing characters, seed and straw yields, economic benefits and water productivitye0
- Comparator
- 0.6 and 0.8 IW:CPE ratiose0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an irrigation at 0.4 IW:CPE ratio significantly in fluenced the yield-attributing characters, seed and straw yields, economic benefits and water productivity of chickpea compared with 0.6 and 0.8 IW:CPE ratios”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea height and branch number increased with IW:CPE ratio.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- IW:CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- height and number of branchese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“height and number of branches increased with in creasing IW:CPE ratio”
e1“chickpea compared with 0.6 and 0.8 IW:CPE ratios”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprinkler irrigation significantly increased growth, yield traits, seed and straw yield, economic benefits, and water productivity of both crops.
- Taxon
- soybean and chickpeaCicer arietinumGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- Sprinkler irrigatione0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes, seed and straw yields, economic benefits and water productivitye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sprinkler irrigation resulted in significantly higher growth and yield attributes, seed and straw yields, economic benefits and water productivity of both the crops.”
e1“soybean and chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.6 IW:CPE, soybean seed yield was 51.3% higher than at 0.4 IW:CPE.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 0.6 IW:CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- seed of soybeane0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 51.3%e0
- Comparator
- 0.4e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The irrigation at 0.6 IW:CPE ratio showed 51.3% and 39.0% higher seed of soybean over 0.4 and 0.8 IW:CPE ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.6 IW:CPE, soybean seed yield was 39.0% higher than at 0.8 IW:CPE.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 0.6 IW:CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- seed of soybeane0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 39.0%e0
- Comparator
- 0.8 IW:CPE ratioe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The irrigation at 0.6 IW:CPE ratio showed 51.3% and 39.0% higher seed of soybean over 0.4 and 0.8 IW:CPE ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.4 IW:CPE, chickpea seed yield was 14.5% higher than at 0.6 IW:CPE.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 0.4 IW:CPE of irrigatione0
- Outcome
- seed of chickpeae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 14.5%e0
- Comparator
- 0.6e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“0.4 IW:CPE of irrigation yielded 14.5% and 32.5% higher seed of chickpea compared with 0.6 and 0.8 IW:CPE”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.4 IW:CPE, chickpea seed yield was 32.5% higher than at 0.8 IW:CPE.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 0.4 IW:CPE of irrigatione0
- Outcome
- seed of chickpeae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 32.5%e0
- Comparator
- 0.8 IW:CPEe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“0.4 IW:CPE of irrigation yielded 14.5% and 32.5% higher seed of chickpea compared with 0.6 and 0.8 IW:CPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprinkler irrigation raised soybean seed yield by 8.3% over check basin irrigation.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- sprinkler irriga tione0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 8.3%e0
- Comparator
- check basin irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mean response of sprinkler irriga tion was recorded 8.3% in soybean and 11.7% in chickpea higher seed yield over check basin irrigation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprinkler irrigation raised chickpea seed yield by 11.7% over check basin irrigation.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- sprinkler irriga tione0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 11.7%e0
- Comparator
- check basin irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mean response of sprinkler irriga tion was recorded 8.3% in soybean and 11.7% in chickpea higher seed yield over check basin irrigation.”
Claim · model-written summary
75% RDF plus FYM increased soybean growth, yield traits, seed yield, water productivity, and protein production over other nutrition treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + 2.5 t FYM/hae0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes, seed yield, water productivity and protein productione0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Comparator
- other nutrition treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increases in growth and yield attributes, seed yield, water productivity and protein production of soybean and chickpea were noticed with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + 2.5 t FYM/ha compared with other nutrition treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
75% RDF plus FYM increased chickpea growth, yield traits, seed yield, water productivity, and protein production over other nutrition treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + 2.5 t FYM/hae0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes, seed yield, water productivity and protein productione0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Comparator
- other nutrition treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increases in growth and yield attributes, seed yield, water productivity and protein production of soybean and chickpea were noticed with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + 2.5 t FYM/ha compared with other nutrition treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
75% RDF plus FYM gave higher system productivity, net profit, and production and economic efficacy.
- Taxon
- soybean and chickpeaCicer arietinumGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + 2.5 t FYM/hae0
- Outcome
- system productivity, net profit and production and economic efficacye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Addition of 75% RDF + 2.5 t FYM/ha also achieved higher system productivity, net profit and production and economic efficacy.”
e1“soybean and chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
After chickpea harvest, 0.4 IW:CPE gave maximum soil N, P, K, and S availability compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 0.4 IW:CPE ratioe0
- Outcome
- availability of N, P, K and Se0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After harvesting of the second crop of chickpea, maximum availability of N, P, K and S was recorded under 0.4 IW:CPE ratio, sprinkler irrigation and application of 75% RDF + 2.5 t FYM/ha compared to other treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
After chickpea harvest, sprinkler irrigation gave maximum soil N, P, K, and S availability compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- sprinkler irrigatione0
- Outcome
- availability of N, P, K and Se0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After harvesting of the second crop of chickpea, maximum availability of N, P, K and S was recorded under 0.4 IW:CPE ratio, sprinkler irrigation and application of 75% RDF + 2.5 t FYM/ha compared to other treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
After chickpea harvest, 75% RDF plus FYM gave maximum soil N, P, K, and S availability compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + 2.5 t FYM/hae0
- Outcome
- availability of N, P, K and Se0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After harvesting of the second crop of chickpea, maximum availability of N, P, K and S was recorded under 0.4 IW:CPE ratio, sprinkler irrigation and application of 75% RDF + 2.5 t FYM/ha compared to other treatments.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · physiology: water · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →irrigation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
339 papers more in this group
See all 343 papers →fertilization · control · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.