Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out on clay soil in El-Gemmeiza Agric. Res. St., ARC, El-Gharbiya Governorate, Egypt during 2015 and 2016 seasons to study the effect of four phosphorus and boron fertilizers sources on leaves chemical composition, photosynthetic pigments and water relations, growth, seed cotton yield/fed and its components and fiber quality of Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86. A split-plot design with four replicates was used, where the main plots included treatments of phosphorus namely; A- Soil application of 22.5 kg P2O5/fed. as superphosphate (Control), B- Phosphate rock + Phosphorein (400g/30kg seed), C- Foliar application of 2 ml phosphoric acid/liter water, and D- Phosphorein (400g/30kg seed)., and the sub plots involved the sources of boron namely; 1- Control (without application), 2- Foliar spray with boric acid, 3- Foliar spray with B-Nano, and 4- Foliar spray with B-EDTA. The obtained important could be summarized as follows: 1-The phosphorus sources gave significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed, final plant height and No. of sympodia/plant, in favor of foliar application with phosphoric acid.2- Foliar application with boron treatments fertilization significantly affected leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate in 2016 season, plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, where the superiority was found in favor of foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter water. 3-The interaction between phosphorus and boron fertilizers sources gave a significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, boll weight, lint % and seed index in 2015 season and No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., in 2015 and 2016 seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed and foliar spraying with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.4- Upper half mean length, uniformity index, micronaire reading and fiber strength did not affect by the different phosphorus and boron sources and their interaction in both seasons.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus sources significantly affected leaves N, P, K in favor of soil-applied P2O5.
- Taxon
- Egyptian Cotton
.jpg?width=60)
Gossypium barbadenset0 - Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fede0
- Outcome
- leaves N, P, Ke0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The phosphorus sources gave significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed, final plant height and No. of sympodia/plant, in favor of foliar application with phosphoric acid.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus sources significantly affected photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates in favor of soil-applied P2O5.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fede0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydratese0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphorus sources gave significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed, final plant height and No. of sympodia/plant, in favor of foliar application with phosphoric acid.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus sources significantly affected proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit in favor of soil-applied P2O5.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fede0
- Outcome
- proline contents, leaves water content, water deficite0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphorus sources gave significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed, final plant height and No. of sympodia/plant, in favor of foliar application with phosphoric acid.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus sources significantly affected relative water content and osmotic pressure in favor of soil-applied P2O5.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fede0
- Outcome
- relative water content and osmotic pressuree0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphorus sources gave significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed, final plant height and No. of sympodia/plant, in favor of foliar application with phosphoric acid.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus sources significantly affected No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight in favor of soil-applied P2O5.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fede0
- Outcome
- No. of open bolls/plant, boll weighte0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphorus sources gave significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed, final plant height and No. of sympodia/plant, in favor of foliar application with phosphoric acid.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus sources significantly affected seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed in favor of soil-applied P2O5.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fede0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fede0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphorus sources gave significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed, final plant height and No. of sympodia/plant, in favor of foliar application with phosphoric acid.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus sources significantly affected lint percentage and seed index in favor of soil-applied P2O5.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fede0
- Outcome
- lint percentage and seed indexe0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphorus sources gave significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed, final plant height and No. of sympodia/plant, in favor of foliar application with phosphoric acid.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar phosphoric acid favored final plant height and sympodia number.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- foliar application with phosphoric acide0
- Outcome
- final plant height and No. of sympodia/plante0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The phosphorus sources gave significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed, final plant height and No. of sympodia/plant, in favor of foliar application with phosphoric acid.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar B-Nano significantly affected leaves N, P, K with superior results.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- leaves N, P, Ke0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with boron treatments fertilization significantly affected leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate in 2016 season, plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, where the superiority was found in favor of foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar B-Nano significantly affected photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates with superior results.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydratese0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with boron treatments fertilization significantly affected leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate in 2016 season, plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, where the superiority was found in favor of foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar B-Nano significantly affected proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit with superior results.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- proline contents, leaves water content, water deficite0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with boron treatments fertilization significantly affected leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate in 2016 season, plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, where the superiority was found in favor of foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar B-Nano significantly affected relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate with superior results.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration ratee0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with boron treatments fertilization significantly affected leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate in 2016 season, plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, where the superiority was found in favor of foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar B-Nano significantly affected plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant with superior results.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plante0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with boron treatments fertilization significantly affected leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate in 2016 season, plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, where the superiority was found in favor of foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar B-Nano significantly affected No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight with superior results.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- No. of open bolls/plant, boll weighte0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with boron treatments fertilization significantly affected leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate in 2016 season, plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, where the superiority was found in favor of foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar B-Nano significantly affected seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed. with superior results.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed.e0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with boron treatments fertilization significantly affected leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate in 2016 season, plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, where the superiority was found in favor of foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar B-Nano significantly affected lint percentage and seed index with superior results.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- lint percentage and seed indexe0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with boron treatments fertilization significantly affected leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content, osmotic pressure and transpiration rate in 2016 season, plant height at harvest, No. of sympodia/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., lint percentage and seed index in both seasons, where the superiority was found in favor of foliar spray with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined P2O5 and B-Nano significantly affected leaves N, P, K.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed and foliar spraying with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- leaves N, P, Ke0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between phosphorus and boron fertilizers sources gave a significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, boll weight, lint % and seed index in 2015 season and No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., in 2015 and 2016 seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed and foliar spraying with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined P2O5 and B-Nano significantly affected photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed and foliar spraying with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydratese0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between phosphorus and boron fertilizers sources gave a significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, boll weight, lint % and seed index in 2015 season and No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., in 2015 and 2016 seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed and foliar spraying with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined P2O5 and B-Nano significantly affected proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed and foliar spraying with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- proline contents, leaves water content, water deficite0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between phosphorus and boron fertilizers sources gave a significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, boll weight, lint % and seed index in 2015 season and No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., in 2015 and 2016 seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed and foliar spraying with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined P2O5 and B-Nano significantly affected relative water content and osmotic pressure.
- Taxon
- Egyptian CottonGossypium barbadenset0
- Material
- Giza 86e1
- Treatment
- soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed and foliar spraying with B-Nano 5 g/liter watere0
- Outcome
- relative water content and osmotic pressuree0
- Direction
- in favor ofe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between phosphorus and boron fertilizers sources gave a significant effect on leaves N, P, K, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total carbohydrates and proline contents, leaves water content, water deficit, relative water content and osmotic pressure in 2016 season, boll weight, lint % and seed index in 2015 season and No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed., in 2015 and 2016 seasons, in favor of soil application with 22.5 kg P2O5/fed and foliar spraying with B-Nano 5 g/liter water.”
e1“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86”
t0“Egyptian Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · growth · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · quality: grain · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · physiology: water · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
phosphorus · quality: grain · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · nutrient: content · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.