Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Sowing Dates on Potential Yield and Rust Resistance of Some Wheat Cultivars

Essam Gebrel; M. Gad; A. Kishk

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat production influenced by stripe, stem and Leaf rusts all over the world and Egypt. In the preset study, effect of sowing dates (1st November, 15th November, 1st December and 15th December) on rust fungi causing agents and their impact on potential yield of nine wheat cultivars. (Giza 171, Shandaweel 1, Misr 1, Misr 2, Sakha 94, Sakha 95, Sids 12, Gemmeiza 11 and Gemmeiza 12) were evaluated during 2015/16 and 2016/17 seasons. Results showed that among sowing dates, rust severity was lower in early sowing (1st November and 15th November) and sever infection was in late sowing (1st December and 15th December). In the early sowing has paramount importance to combat rust severity effectively. Results also revealed that sowing in Nov.15 resulted in high number of days to heading, plant height, number of spikes/m2, biological yield, number of grains/spike and straw yield in both seasons. Meanwhile sowing in 1st November resulted in high values of days to maturity and 1000 kernel weight. Wheat cultivars notably differed in all previous mentioned characters. Gemmeiza 11 was early in heading while Misr 2 was delayed in both seasons. Sids 12 and Gemmeiza 11 were early in maturity while Shandaweel 1 was vice versa. Sakha 95 cultivar surpassed other cultivars in grain yield/fed followed by Misr 2. Moreover Sakha 95 expressed high rust resistance followed by Shandaweel 1 and Giza171 in both seasons. Results exhibited that rust disease severity has a strong negative correlation with grain yield and the interaction effects among sowing dates and different wheat cultivars were significant on all studied characters in both seasons. Finally, delaying sowing date caused considerable reduction in previous studied characters in both seasons and increase rust severity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing had lower rust severity than late sowing.

Treatment
early sowinge0
Outcome
rust severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
late sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“rust severity was lower in early sowing (1st November and 15th November) and sever infection was in late sowing (1st December and 15th December)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 15 sowing had high heading time, height, spike density, biological yield, grains per spike and straw yield.

Treatment
sowing in Nov.15e0
Outcome
number of days to heading, plant height, number of spikes/m2e0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing in Nov.15 resulted in high number of days to heading, plant height, number of spikes/m2, biological yield, number of grains/spike and straw yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 1 sowing had high days to maturity and thousand-kernel weight.

Treatment
sowing in 1st Novembere0
Outcome
days to maturity and 1000 kernel weighte0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing in 1st November resulted in high values of days to maturity and 1000 kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–999 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed in the studied traits.

Material
Wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
all previous mentioned characterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wheat cultivars notably differed in all previous mentioned characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1070 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmeiza 11 headed early while Misr 2 headed late.

Material
Gemmeiza 11e0
Outcome
headinge0
Direction
earlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gemmeiza 11 was early in heading while Misr 2 was delayed in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sids 12 and Gemmeiza 11 matured early.

Material
Sids 12e0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
earlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sids 12 and Gemmeiza 11 were early in maturity while Shandaweel 1 was vice versa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 95 had the highest grain yield, followed by Misr 2.

Material
Sakha 95e0
Outcome
grain yield/fede0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sakha 95 cultivar surpassed other cultivars in grain yield/fed followed by Misr 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1310 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 95 had high rust resistance followed by Shandaweel 1 and Giza171.

Material
Sakha 95e0
Outcome
rust resistancee0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sakha 95 expressed high rust resistance followed by Shandaweel 1 and Giza171 in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1413 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rust severity was strongly negatively correlated with grain yield.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
rust disease severitye0

Not reportedInteractorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“rust disease severity has a strong negative correlation with grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1510 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date by cultivar interactions significantly affected studied traits.

Material
wheat cultivarse0
Treatment
sowing datese0
Outcome
all studied characterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction effects among sowing dates and different wheat cultivars were significant on all studied characters in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing reduced studied traits and increased rust severity.

Treatment
delaying sowing datee0
Outcome
previous studied characterse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“delaying sowing date caused considerable reduction in previous studied characters in both seasons and increase rust severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1781 · show in text ↑

sowing time · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 14 positive, 9 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.