Paper · 1987

The effect of management practices in a continuous wheat rotation on weed populations

K.J. Kirkland; S.A. Brandt

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A five year field study was conducted at five locations in West Central and North West Saskatchewan to determine the effect of cropping practices on weed populations in a continuous 'Wheat rotation.Fall tillage, normal stubble height, tall stubble and varying fertility levels (N and P) did not directly influence populations of grassy and broadleaved weeds.In general, there was no significant differences between the herbicide combinations on grassy and broadleaved weed populations at any of the five sites.Diclofop methyl (Hoegrass) applied as a tank mix with bromoxynil (Torch) or as a separate application with chlorsulfuron (Glean) or Bromoxynil/MCPA (Buctril M) and Triallate (Avadex B\..J) applied in the fall, followed by 2,4-D amine in the spring all reduced weed populations significantly.Yield increases from the application of Hoegrass plus Glean, Hoegrass/ Torch, Hoegrass plus Buctril M and Avadex + 2,4-D were 21, 22, 19 and 15% respectively. Materials and MethodsIn 1982, a continuous wheat rotation was initiated at Kindersley, Scott, Lashburn, Mervin and Loon Lake.The site at Kindersley is located on a Brown soil while the sites at Scott, Lashburn, Hervin and Loon Lake are located on Dark Brown, Black, Black-Grey Transition and Gr,ey-Wooded soils respectively.The design of the experiment was a split-split plot with four replications.Main plots were stubble treatments, sub plots herbicide

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall tillage, stubble height and fertility did not directly influence grassy and broadleaved weed populations.

Treatment
Fall tillage, normal stubble height, tall stubble and varying fertility levels (N and P)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
populations of grassy and broadleaved weedse0
Direction
did not directly influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fall tillage, normal stubble height, tall stubble and varying fertility levels (N and P) did not directly influence populations of grassy and broadleaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide combinations did not differ significantly in effects on grassy and broadleaved weed populations.

Treatment
herbicide combinationse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
grassy and broadleaved weed populationse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
herbicide combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant differences between the herbicide combinations on grassy and broadleaved weed populations at any of the five sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed diclofop and triallate regimens significantly reduced weed populations.

Treatment
Diclofop methyl (Hoegrass)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Diclofop methyl (Hoegrass) applied as a tank mix with bromoxynil (Torch) or as a separate application with chlorsulfuron (Glean) or Bromoxynil/MCPA (Buctril M) and Triallate (Avadex B\..J) applied in the fall, followed by 2,4-D amine in the spring all reduced weed populations significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoegrass plus Glean increased wheat yield by 21.

Treatment
Hoegrass plus Gleane0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
21e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield increases from the application of Hoegrass plus Glean, Hoegrass/ Torch, Hoegrass plus Buctril M and Avadex + 2,4-D were 21, 22, 19 and 15% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoegrass/ Torch increased wheat yield by 22.

Treatment
Hoegrass/ Torche0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield increases from the application of Hoegrass plus Glean, Hoegrass/ Torch, Hoegrass plus Buctril M and Avadex + 2,4-D were 21, 22, 19 and 15% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoegrass plus Buctril M increased wheat yield by 19.

Treatment
Hoegrass plus Buctril Me0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
19e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield increases from the application of Hoegrass plus Glean, Hoegrass/ Torch, Hoegrass plus Buctril M and Avadex + 2,4-D were 21, 22, 19 and 15% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Avadex + 2,4-D increased wheat yield by 15%.

Treatment
Avadex + 2,4-De0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield increases from the application of Hoegrass plus Glean, Hoegrass/ Torch, Hoegrass plus Buctril M and Avadex + 2,4-D were 21, 22, 19 and 15% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–958 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

diclofop-methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

phosphorus · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 362 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.