Paper · 2019 · Journal of Plant Production

Influence of Sowing Dates, Nitrogen Fertilizer under Low Rates and Foliar with Boron on Production and Quality of Wheat

H. A. Ahmed; A. Mahdy

12
claims
40
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present work was conducted at the Experimental Farm of the Agriculture Research Center in Al-Azhar Univ. at Assiut, Governorate during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons to study the effect of three sowing dates (1st November, 15th November and 1st December), nitrogen fertilizer three rates (30, 50 and 70 kg N /fad.) and foliar application with boron (control, 50 and 100 ppm( on the production and quality of wheat (cv. Sids-12). The experiments were performed in a split-split plot design with replicates three, where sowing dates were assigned to the main plot, while nitrogen rates and boron were distributed randomly in the sub and sub-sub plot, respectively.The obtained results showed that sowing dates significant effect in plant height, flag leaf area, number of grains/spike, 1000-grains weight (g) and carbohydrate percentage in both seasons, except number of spikes/m2 in the second season only, as well as grain yields ton/fad in the first season only. On the otherhand, number of tillers/plant, straw yield ton/fad. and protein percentage didn't show significant effects in both seasons. In generally, sown wheat in 15- November produced the highest values in all studied traits except of 1000-grains weight (g), in the first season only from sowing on 1- December. Increasing the level of nitrogen fertilizer from 30 or 50 to 70 kg N /fad. caused a significant increases in all traits under study in both seasons, except straw yield ton/fad. in the second season only. Foliar application with boron significant increases in all studied characters, i.e. plant height, no., of tillers/plant, flag leaf area, no. of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike and 1000-grains weight (g) as well as grain and straw yields/fad. Also, such treatment increased protein and carbohydrate percentages of wheat grains.In general, the highest value of grain yield/ fad. and quality were obtained from sowing wheat on the 15th Nov. when received 70 N / fad. and boron foliar application concentration of 100 ppm under Assiut conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date significantly affected plant height, flag leaf area and number of grains per spike in both seasons.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
sowing datese0
Outcome
plant height, flag leaf area, number of grains/spikee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing dates significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“sowing dates significant effect in plant height, flag leaf area, number of grains/spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–787 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date significantly affected 1000-grain weight and carbohydrate percentage in both seasons.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
sowing datese0
Outcome
1000-grains weight (g) and carbohydrate percentagee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing dates significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“1000-grains weight (g) and carbohydrate percentage in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–855 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date did not significantly affect number of tillers per plant, straw yield or protein percentage in either season.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
sowing datese0
Outcome
number of tillers/plant, straw yield ton/fad. and protein percentagee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing dates significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of tillers/plant, straw yield ton/fad. and protein percentage didn't show significant effects in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1103 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sown on 15 November produced the highest values in all studied traits except 1000-grain weight.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
15- Novembere0
Outcome
all studied traitse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
except of 1000-grains weight (g)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sown wheat in 15- November produced the highest values in all studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“except of 1000-grains weight (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1228 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising nitrogen from 30 or 50 to 70 kg N per fad. significantly increased all traits under study in both seasons except straw yield in the second season.

Material
Sids-12e3
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
all traits under studye1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
except straw yield ton/fad. in the second season onlye2
Comparator
30 or 50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the level of nitrogen fertilizer from 30 or 50 to 70 kg N /fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused a significant increases in all traits under study in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1430 · show in text ↑
e2

“except straw yield ton/fad. in the second season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1485 · show in text ↑
e3

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron significantly increased plant height, number of tillers per plant and flag leaf area of wheat relative to control.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
Foliar application with borone0
Outcome
plant height, no., of tillers/plant, flag leaf areae0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with boron significant increases in all studied characters, i.e. plant height, no., of tillers/plant, flag leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1622 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application with boron (control, 50 and 100 ppm(”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–379 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron significantly increased number of spikes per m2, number of grains per spike and 1000-grain weight of wheat relative to control.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
Foliar application with borone0
Outcome
no. of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike and 1000-grains weight (g)e3
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with boron significant increases in all studied characters, i.e. plant height, no., of tillers/plant, flag leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1622 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application with boron (control, 50 and 100 ppm(”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–379 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
e3

“no. of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike and 1000-grains weight (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron significantly increased grain and straw yields of wheat relative to control.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
Foliar application with borone0
Outcome
grain and straw yields/fade3
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with boron significant increases in all studied characters, i.e. plant height, no., of tillers/plant, flag leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1622 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application with boron (control, 50 and 100 ppm(”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–379 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
e3

“grain and straw yields/fad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron increased protein and carbohydrate percentages of wheat grains relative to control.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
Foliar application with borone0
Outcome
protein and carbohydrate percentagese3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with boron significant increases in all studied characters, i.e. plant height, no., of tillers/plant, flag leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1622 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application with boron (control, 50 and 100 ppm(”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–379 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
e3

“Also, such treatment increased protein and carbohydrate percentages of wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing wheat on 15 November with 70 N per fad. and 100 ppm foliar boron gave the highest grain yield and quality under Assiut conditions.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
sowing wheat on the 15th Nov.e0
Outcome
grain yield/ fad. and qualitye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
when received 70 N / fad. and boron foliar application concentration of 100 ppme1
Setting
Assiut conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest value of grain yield/ fad. and quality were obtained from sowing wheat on the 15th Nov.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1926 · show in text ↑
e1

“when received 70 N / fad. and boron foliar application concentration of 100 ppm under Assiut conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1927–2030 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date significantly affected grain yield of wheat in the first season only.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
sowing datese0
Outcome
grain yields ton/fade1
Qualifier
first season onlye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing dates significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“as well as grain yields ton/fad in the first season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–967 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date significantly affected number of spikes per m2 in the second season only.

Material
Sids-12e2
Treatment
sowing datese0
Outcome
number of spikes/m2e1
Qualifier
second season onlye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing dates significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“except number of spikes/m2 in the second season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–909 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (cv. Sids-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

boron atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.