Abstract
Exploiting the production potential of high yielding rice varieties through agronomic management is one of the alternatives to feed the ever growing population. For this, fertilizers from different sources and modern planting techniques have contributed substantially to the spectacular increase in rice yield and to improve soil properties. In order to study the effect of planting techniques and integrated nutrient management in rice. A field experiments was conducted at Crop Research Centre of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut (Utter Pradesh) during Kharif 2017. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. The treatment consisted of three planting techniques (P1- conventional puddled transplanting (CT-TPR), P2- wide raised beds transplanted rice (WB-TPR) and P3- reduced till transplanted rice (RT-TPR) and ten integrated nutrient management (F1- control, (no fertilizer), F2- RDF (150-60-40 kg NPK/ha), F3- 75%RDF + FYM 5 t/ha, F4-75% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + Zn, F5- 75% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + BF, F6- 75% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha +BF + Zn, F7- 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha, F8- 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + Zn, F9- 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + BF and F10- 100% RDF FYM 5 t/ha+BF+ Zn in this way there were 30 treatment combinations. The values of growth contributing characters viz. plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g m-2), and yield attributes like number of panicles m-2, length of panicle (cm), number of panicle-1, grain weight panicle-1, test weight (g), grain and straw yield (q ha-1) of rice were increasing significantly with conventional puddled transplanted method (P1) followed by wide raised beds transplanted method (P2) and significantly superior over rest of the treatments. In case of integrated nutrient management the growth characters like plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g), yield attributes’ number of panicle m-2, length of panicle, grain weight panicle-1, test weight (g), grain and straw yield (q ha-1) of rice were maximum under F10 (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM + BF + Zn) which was at par with F9 (100% RDF +5t/ha FYM +BF) during course of investigation. The maximum gross return and net return were noted under P2 (wide raised beds transplanted rice) with F10 (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM+ BF + Zn) [P2F10] application. The highest benefit cost ratio were recorded with WB-TPR SRI method with (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM+ BF + Zn) treatment (P2F10) followed by WB-TPR with (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM+BF) (P2F9) they proved more remunerative then other treatment combinations. CT-TPR used higher amount of water than WB-TPR, with water saving of 14.5% in WB-TPR. Significantly higher water productivity was recorded in WB-TPR as compared to CT-TPR.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional puddled transplanting significantly increased growth traits relative to the other planting methods.
- Taxon
- Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- conventional puddled transplanted method (P1)e0
- Outcome
- plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g m-2)e0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- wide raised beds transplanted method (P2)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g m-2), and yield attributes like number of panicles m-2, length of panicle (cm), number of panicle-1, grain weight panicle-1, test weight (g), grain and straw yield (q ha-1) of rice were increasing significantly with conventional puddled transplanted method (P1) followed by wide raised beds transplanted method (P2) and significantly superior over rest of the treatments”
t0“Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional puddled transplanting significantly increased rice yield attributes and grain and straw yields.
- Taxon
- Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- conventional puddled transplanted method (P1)e0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yield (q ha-1)e0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- wide raised beds transplanted method (P2)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes like number of panicles m-2, length of panicle (cm), number of panicle-1, grain weight panicle-1, test weight (g), grain and straw yield (q ha-1) of rice were increasing significantly with conventional puddled transplanted method (P1) followed by wide raised beds transplanted method (P2)”
t0“Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
F10 produced maximum rice growth traits and was at par with F9.
- Taxon
- Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- F10 (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM + BF + Zn)e0
- Outcome
- plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g)e0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- F9 (100% RDF +5t/ha FYM +BF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (cm), number of tillers m-2, dry matter accumulation (g), yield attributes’ number of panicle m-2, length of panicle, grain weight panicle-1, test weight (g), grain and straw yield (q ha-1) of rice were maximum under F10 (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM + BF + Zn) which was at par with F9 (100% RDF +5t/ha FYM +BF)”
t0“Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
F10 produced maximum rice grain and straw yields, at par with F9.
- Taxon
- Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- F10 (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM + BF + Zn)e0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yield (q ha-1)e0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- F9 (100% RDF +5t/ha FYM +BF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain and straw yield (q ha-1) of rice were maximum under F10 (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM + BF + Zn) which was at par with F9 (100% RDF +5t/ha FYM +BF)”
t0“Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
P2F10 yielded maximum gross and net returns.
- Taxon
- Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- P2 (wide raised beds transplanted rice) with F10 (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM+ BF + Zn) [P2F10]e0
- Outcome
- maximum gross return and net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum gross return and net return were noted under P2 (wide raised beds transplanted rice) with F10 (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM+ BF + Zn) [P2F10] application.”
t0“Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
P2F10 had the highest benefit cost ratio, followed by P2F9.
- Taxon
- Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- WB-TPR SRI method with (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM+ BF + Zn) treatment (P2F10)e0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- WB-TPR with (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM+BF) (P2F9)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest benefit cost ratio were recorded with WB-TPR SRI method with (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM+ BF + Zn) treatment (P2F10) followed by WB-TPR with (100% RDF+5t/ha FYM+BF) (P2F9)”
t0“Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
WB-TPR saved 14.5% water versus CT-TPR.
- Taxon
- Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- WB-TPRe0
- Outcome
- water savinge0
- Direction
- savinge0
- Value
- 14.5%e0
- Comparator
- CT-TPRe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CT-TPR used higher amount of water than WB-TPR, with water saving of 14.5% in WB-TPR.”
t0“Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
WB-TPR had significantly higher water productivity than CT-TPR.
- Taxon
- Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- WB-TPRe0
- Outcome
- water productivitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- CT-TPRe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher water productivity was recorded in WB-TPR as compared to CT-TPR.”
t0“Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
415 papers more in this group
See all 419 papers →tillage · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →transplanting · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
725 papers more in this group
See all 729 papers →transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
1,074 papers more in this group
See all 1,078 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.