Paper · 2019 · Acta Horticulturae

Nitrogen and carbon management in Australian mango orchards to improve productivity and reduce greenhouse gas emissions

G.R. Dickinson; P.J. O’Farrell; K.J. Ridgway; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Australian mango orchards, particularly of the 'Kensington Pride' cultivar, are often characterized by low yields and irregular bearing. Improved nutrition management techniques which increase total soil carbon sequestration and reduce nitrogen losses (nitrous oxide) may improve productivity and also reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A factorial trial was established in a 'Kensington Pride' mango orchard at Mareeba, Australia to assess the benefits of applying organic hay mulch to tree rows in combination with three nitrogen fertiliser treatments including two controlled-release fertiliser products. Three years after the initiation of treatments it was found that mango tree growth and fruit productivity was significantly improved when mulching was used to increase soil organic matter. Mulched soils had improved soil water holding capacity, less temperature variability, increased root biomass in the top soil, greater canopy leaf area and higher plant tissue potassium levels. Average fruit weights were increased by 10% and mango fruit yields per tree increased by 11%. Fruit quality was not affected when standard fungicide management treatments were used, although disease levels were higher with no post-harvest fungicide treatment. The nitrogen fertiliser products investigated did not have a significant influence on mango growth or final productivity. Trial results suggest that the adoption of mulching practices in mango orchards is a management practice which can increase orchard productivity and the sequestration of soil organic carbon, without detrimental effects on fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching significantly improved mango growth and fruit productivity.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
mango tree growth and fruit productivitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mango tree growth and fruit productivity was significantly improved when mulching was used to increase soil organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched soils had improved water holding capacity.

Treatment
Mulched soilse0
Outcome
soil water holding capacitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulched soils had improved soil water holding capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched soils had less temperature variability.

Treatment
Mulched soilse0
Outcome
temperature variabilitye0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulched soils had improved soil water holding capacity, less temperature variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased topsoil root biomass, canopy leaf area and tissue potassium levels.

Treatment
Mulched soilse0
Outcome
root biomass in the top soil, greater canopy leaf area and higher plant tissue potassium levelse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulched soils had improved soil water holding capacity, less temperature variability, increased root biomass in the top soil, greater canopy leaf area and higher plant tissue potassium levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased mean mango fruit weight by 10%.

Outcome
Average fruit weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average fruit weights were increased by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased mango fruit yield per tree by 11%.

Outcome
mango fruit yields per treee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mango fruit yields per tree increased by 11%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality was unaffected with standard fungicide management.

Treatment
standard fungicide management treatmentse0
Outcome
Fruit qualitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit quality was not affected when standard fungicide management treatments were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease levels were higher without postharvest fungicide treatment.

Treatment
no post-harvest fungicide treatmente0
Outcome
disease levelse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease levels were higher with no post-harvest fungicide treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer products had no significant effect on mango growth or final productivity.

Treatment
nitrogen fertiliser productse0
Outcome
mango growth or final productivitye0
Direction
did not have a significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen fertiliser products investigated did not have a significant influence on mango growth or final productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1369 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend orchard mulching for higher productivity and soil organic carbon sequestration without harming fruit quality.

Treatment
mulching practicese0
Outcome
increase orchard productivity and the sequestration of soil organic carbon, without detrimental effects on fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adoption of mulching practices in mango orchards is a management practice which can increase orchard productivity and the sequestration of soil organic carbon, without detrimental effects on fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1605 · show in text ↑

fungicide · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.