Paper · 2019 · Journal of Plant Production

Response of Tomato Plants to Water Irrigation Levels and some Foliar Applications under Drip Irrigation System: 1-Vegetative Growth and Chemical Constituents of L.

K. Dawa; T. Al-Gazar; A. Abdel-Fatah

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This experiment was conducted during the summer seasons of 2015 and 2016 to investigate the effect of various water irrigation levels (60%, 80% and 100% from ETo) and some foliar application treatments (chitosan, salicylic acid, silicon and proline) and their interactions on vegetative growth characteristics and leaf chemical constituents of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L) " Fayruz " hybrid under surface drip irrigation system in a private farm at Gemiana village near El-Mansoura city, Dakahlia Government, Egypt. All treatments under investigation significantly affected vegetative growth parameters, i.e., plant height, number of branches, number of leaves, leaf area, fresh and dry weights, as well as chemical constituents of leavesas photosynthetic pigments (Chl. a, Chl. b and total Chl. a+b), leaf minerals content (N, P and K), proline and peroxidase activity. Results indicated that the highest values of all aforementioned parameters except proline and peroxidase were recorded when plants irrigated with 80% from ETO compare to 60% and 100 from ETO in both season of study, while the highest values of proline and peroxidase activity were recorded with 60% from ETO. All foliar applications treatments significantly increased vegetative growth traits, leaf mineral and pigments content compared to control (without foliar spray) which recorded the highest values of proline content and peroxidase activity. Foliar application of chitosan at 500 ppm was the most effective treatment on all aforementioned parameters followed with SA at 100 ppm. Concerning the interaction effect among water irrigation levels and foliar application treatments, the best result of all studied parameters were recorded when plants irrigated with 80% from ETO and sprayed with chitosan at 500 ppm. Therefore, this treatment could be recommended to increase tomato plant growth and improve its performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants irrigated with 80% ETo had the highest vegetative growth values, compared with 60% and 100% ETo.

Treatment
irrigated with 80% from ETOe1
Outcome
all aforementioned parameters except proline and peroxidasee1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
60% and 100 from ETOe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest values of all aforementioned parameters except proline and peroxidase were recorded when plants irrigated with 80% from ETO compare to 60% and 100 from ETO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants irrigated with 60% ETo had the highest proline and peroxidase activity.

Treatment
60% from ETOe2
Outcome
proline and peroxidase activitye2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e2

“while the highest values of proline and peroxidase activity were recorded with 60% from ETO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar applications significantly increased vegetative growth traits, leaf mineral content and pigment content compared with the control without foliar spray.

Treatment
foliar applications treatmentse3
Outcome
vegetative growth traits, leaf mineral and pigments contente3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
control (without foliar spray)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e3

“All foliar applications treatments significantly increased vegetative growth traits, leaf mineral and pigments content compared to control (without foliar spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control without foliar spray had the highest proline content and peroxidase activity.

Outcome
proline content and peroxidase activitye4
Qualifier
control (without foliar spray)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e4

“control (without foliar spray) which recorded the highest values of proline content and peroxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar chitosan at 500 ppm was the most effective treatment on all parameters, followed by SA at 100 ppm.

Treatment
Foliar application of chitosan at 500 ppme5
Outcome
all aforementioned parameterse5
Direction
most effectivee5
Qualifier
followed with SA at 100 ppme5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar application of chitosan at 500 ppm was the most effective treatment on all aforementioned parameters followed with SA at 100 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 80% ETo combined with chitosan at 500 ppm gave the best result on all studied parameters.

Treatment
irrigated with 80% from ETO and sprayed with chitosan at 500 ppme6
Outcome
all studied parameterse6
Direction
best resulte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e6

“the best result of all studied parameters were recorded when plants irrigated with 80% from ETO and sprayed with chitosan at 500 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All irrigation and foliar treatments significantly affected vegetative growth parameters.

Treatment
All treatments under investigatione0
Outcome
vegetative growth parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatments under investigation significantly affected vegetative growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–612 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The chitosan and irrigation treatment is recommended to increase tomato plant growth.

Outcome
tomato plant growthe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e7

“this treatment could be recommended to increase tomato plant growth and improve its performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1906 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 55 positive, 6 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.