Paper · 2020 · Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security

The effect of Si on minimizing the implications of water stress on tomato plants

Mohamed Abd El- Aziz

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Water scarcity is a global issue especially in arid regions and rationalizing the use of fresh irrigation water has become necessary to satisfy water needs. The current study investigates using Si to alleviate the implications of water stress on tomato plants grown on a light textured soil. A split-plot experiment was conducted under the field conditions for two successive seasons (2017 and 2018) on tomato under two deficit irrigation levels i.e. 70 and 85% ETc as well as 100% ETc for comparison. Plants were subjected to two levels of silica foliar spray (0 and 0.4 mM). At physiological maturity growth stage, chemical characteristics of tomato fruits as well as total fruit yield were determined. Deficit irrigation decreased contents of chlorophyll A and B in leaves; while increased proline content in plant roots. This consequently decreased tomato fruit yield; while, raised its contents of total dissolved solids and vitamin C. On the other hand, spraying plants with Si raised significantly chlorophyll A and B in leaves and alleviated plant stress by increasing proline content in roots. This increased significantly fruit yield. Irrigation with 85% Etc with Si spray recorded a rather similar fruit yield to those irrigated with 100%Etc. Moreover, Si treatments increased significantly water use efficiency by the crop. Thus, Si spray can take part in saving considered amounts of water that can be used for irrigation of further tomato areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased tomato leaf chlorophyll A and B.

Treatment
Deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
contents of chlorophyll A and B in leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
100% ETce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit irrigation decreased contents of chlorophyll A and B in leaves; while increased proline content in plant roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“70 and 85% ETc as well as 100% ETc for comparison”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation increased tomato root proline content.

Treatment
Deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
proline content in plant rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
100% ETce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit irrigation decreased contents of chlorophyll A and B in leaves; while increased proline content in plant roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“70 and 85% ETc as well as 100% ETc for comparison”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
Deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
tomato fruit yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This consequently decreased tomato fruit yield; while, raised its contents of total dissolved solids and vitamin C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deficit irrigation decreased contents of chlorophyll A and B in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation raised total dissolved solids and vitamin C in tomato fruit.

Treatment
Deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
contents of total dissolved solids and vitamin Ce0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This consequently decreased tomato fruit yield; while, raised its contents of total dissolved solids and vitamin C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deficit irrigation decreased contents of chlorophyll A and B in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon spraying significantly increased tomato leaf chlorophyll A and B.

Treatment
spraying plants with Sie0
Outcome
chlorophyll A and B in leavese0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying plants with Si raised significantly chlorophyll A and B in leaves and alleviated plant stress by increasing proline content in roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon spraying increased tomato root proline content.

Treatment
spraying plants with Sie0
Outcome
proline content in rootse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying plants with Si raised significantly chlorophyll A and B in leaves and alleviated plant stress by increasing proline content in roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon spraying significantly increased tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
Si spraye1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This increased significantly fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si spray can take part in saving considered amounts of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit yield under 85% ETc irrigation with silicon was similar to yield under 100% ETc irrigation.

Treatment
85% Etc with Si spraye0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
rather similare0
Comparator
100%Etce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with 85% Etc with Si spray recorded a rather similar fruit yield to those irrigated with 100%Etc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon treatments significantly increased crop water-use efficiency.

Treatment
Si treatmentse0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, Si treatments increased significantly water use efficiency by the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that silicon spray could save irrigation water for additional tomato area.

Treatment
Si spraye0
Outcome
saving considered amounts of water that can be used for irrigation of further tomato arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, Si spray can take part in saving considered amounts of water that can be used for irrigation of further tomato areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1459 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

37 papers: 35 positive, 2 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 55 positive, 6 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

296 papers: 261 positive, 35 negative or no effect

260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

292 papers more in this group

See all 296 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 239 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.