Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Allelopathic effect of Robinia pseudoacacia on germination and growth of some important food crops of the Garhwal Himalayas

Neha; VP Khanduri; RS Bali; et al.

15
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted to assess the allelopathic effect of leaf and bark aqueous extracts of Robinia pseudoacacia on germination and growth of some important food crops of the Garhwal Himalayas viz. Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare, Lens culinaris and Brassica rapa in laboratory and pot culture experiment. Different leaf and bark aqueous extracts (5%, 10%, and 15%) were prepared by soaking 25g, 50g and 75g of dry leaves and bark powder in 500mL of distilled water for 24 hours at room temperature and the resultant leaf and bark extracts were used to irrigate the seeds of various test crops. The results revealed that in laboratory conditions the concentration dependent significant inhibitory effect of all the concentrations of aqueous leaf extracts on germination, root length and shoot length of all the test crops except in Hordeum vulgare where, the stimulatory effect of all the concentrations of leaf extract was observed in shoot length. Among all the test crops Lens culinaris was found most sensitive with (41.6%) germination and root length (2.1 cm) in the seeds treated with 15% concentration of leaf extract as compared to control having germination (72.3%) and root length (7.2 cm). Similarly the maximum reduction by the 15% concentration of leaf extract was noticed in the shoot length of Brassica rapa (5.5 cm) as compared to control (9.1cm). The 15% bark extract showed the maximum inhibitory effect on the germination of Hordeum vulgare where germination percentage was reduced (48.0%) as compared to control (81.6%). Similarly, the maximum reduction in root length (2.7 cm) and shoot length (2.1 cm) as compared to control with root length (7.2 cm) and shoot length (6.7 cm) was observed in Lens culinaris by 15% bark extract. In pot culture experiment Hordeum vulgare was most sensitive with respect to germination percentage (39.2%) in 15% leaf extract as compared to control (77.0). While in root length maximum inhibitory effect was recorded in Brassica rapa (3.4 cm) by 5% leaf extract as compare with control (4.2 cm). In general the non-significant stimulatory effect of all the concentrations of leaf extract was observed in all the test crops whereas, in Lens culenaris the effect was significant stimulatory with shoot length (19.5cm) in 15% concentration as compared to control (19.0 cm). Similarly 15% bark extract, performed maximum reduction in Brassica rapa where the germination percentage was significantly reduced down (40.7%) as compare with control (77.5%). However, the effect of all the concentrations of bark extract showed non-significant effect on root length and shoot length of all the test crops. Therefore, to reduce allopathic effect on all the test crops viz., Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare, Lens culinaris and Brassica rapa it is advised to remove the fallen leaves and bark from the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous leaf extract of Robinia pseudoacacia significantly inhibited germination, root length and shoot length of the test crops in laboratory conditions, concentration-dependently, except in Hordeum vulgare.

Taxon
test cropse1
Treatment
aqueous leaf extractse1
Outcome
germination, root length and shoot lengthe1
Direction
inhibitorye1
Qualifier
except in Hordeum vulgaree1
Comparator
controle2
Setting
laboratory conditionse1

Verbatim

e1

“in laboratory conditions the concentration dependent significant inhibitory effect of all the concentrations of aqueous leaf extracts on germination, root length and shoot length of all the test crops except in Hordeum vulgare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–861 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among all the test crops Lens culinaris was found most sensitive with (41.6%) germination and root length (2.1 cm) in the seeds treated with 15% concentration of leaf extract as compared to control having germination (72.3%) and root length (7.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Lens culinaris, 15% leaf extract reduced germination to 41.6% against 72.3% in the control.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarise2
Treatment
15% concentration of leaf extracte2
Outcome
germinatione2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
41.6%e2
Qualifier
72.3%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Among all the test crops Lens culinaris was found most sensitive with (41.6%) germination and root length (2.1 cm) in the seeds treated with 15% concentration of leaf extract as compared to control having germination (72.3%) and root length (7.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Lens culinaris, 15% leaf extract reduced root length to 2.1 cm against 7.2 cm in the control.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarise2
Treatment
15% concentration of leaf extracte2
Outcome
root lengthe2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
2.1 cme2
Qualifier
7.2 cme2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Among all the test crops Lens culinaris was found most sensitive with (41.6%) germination and root length (2.1 cm) in the seeds treated with 15% concentration of leaf extract as compared to control having germination (72.3%) and root length (7.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum reduction by 15% leaf extract in shoot length of Brassica rapa was to 5.5 cm against 9.1 cm in the control.

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae1
Treatment
15% concentration of leaf extracte1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
maximum reductione1
Value
5.5 cme1
Qualifier
9.1cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Similarly the maximum reduction by the 15% concentration of leaf extract was noticed in the shoot length of Brassica rapa (5.5 cm) as compared to control (9.1cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% bark extract reduced germination of Hordeum vulgare to 48.0% against 81.6% in the control.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
15% bark extracte1
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
48.0%e1
Qualifier
81.6%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 15% bark extract showed the maximum inhibitory effect on the germination of Hordeum vulgare where germination percentage was reduced (48.0%) as compared to control (81.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% bark extract caused the maximum reduction of root length in Lens culinaris, to 2.7 cm against 7.2 cm in the control.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarise1
Treatment
15% bark extracte1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
maximum reductione1
Value
2.7 cme1
Qualifier
7.2 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Similarly, the maximum reduction in root length (2.7 cm) and shoot length (2.1 cm) as compared to control with root length (7.2 cm) and shoot length (6.7 cm) was observed in Lens culinaris by 15% bark extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% bark extract caused the maximum reduction of shoot length in Lens culinaris, to 2.1 cm against 6.7 cm in the control.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarise1
Treatment
15% bark extracte1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
maximum reductione1
Value
2.1 cme1
Qualifier
6.7 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Similarly, the maximum reduction in root length (2.7 cm) and shoot length (2.1 cm) as compared to control with root length (7.2 cm) and shoot length (6.7 cm) was observed in Lens culinaris by 15% bark extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pot culture, 15% leaf extract reduced germination of Hordeum vulgare to 39.2% against 77.0 in the control.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
15% leaf extracte1
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
39.2%e1
Qualifier
77.0e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
pot culture experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In pot culture experiment Hordeum vulgare was most sensitive with respect to germination percentage (39.2%) in 15% leaf extract as compared to control (77.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum inhibitory effect on root length of Brassica rapa was 3.4 cm under 5% leaf extract against 4.2 cm in the control.

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae1
Treatment
5% leaf extracte1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
maximum inhibitory effecte1
Value
3.4 cme1
Qualifier
4.2 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While in root length maximum inhibitory effect was recorded in Brassica rapa (3.4 cm) by 5% leaf extract as compare with control (4.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All concentrations of leaf extract had a non-significant stimulatory effect in all the test crops.

Taxon
all the test cropse1
Treatment
all the concentrations of leaf extracte1
Outcome
effecte1
Direction
stimulatorye1
Qualifier
non-significante1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“In general the non-significant stimulatory effect of all the concentrations of leaf extract was observed in all the test crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2063–2189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Lens culenaris, 15% leaf extract significantly stimulated shoot length to 19.5 cm against 19.0 cm in the control.

Taxon
Lens culenarise1
Treatment
15% concentratione1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
stimulatorye1
Value
19.5cme1
Qualifier
19.0 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e1

“in Lens culenaris the effect was significant stimulatory with shoot length (19.5cm) in 15% concentration as compared to control (19.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% bark extract significantly reduced germination percentage of Brassica rapa to 40.7% against 77.5% in the control.

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae1
Treatment
15% bark extracte1
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
40.7%e1
Qualifier
77.5%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Similarly 15% bark extract, performed maximum reduction in Brassica rapa where the germination percentage was significantly reduced down (40.7%) as compare with control (77.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2338–2514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All concentrations of bark extract had a non-significant effect on root length and shoot length of all the test crops.

Taxon
all the test cropse1
Treatment
all the concentrations of bark extracte1
Outcome
root length and shoot lengthe1
Direction
non-significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“However, the effect of all the concentrations of bark extract showed non-significant effect on root length and shoot length of all the test crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2516–2661 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

To reduce allelopathic effect on the test crops, the fallen leaves and bark should be removed from the field.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare, Lens culinaris and Brassica rapaBrassica rapaLens culinarisHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
remove the fallen leaves and bark from the fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Therefore, to reduce allopathic effect on all the test crops viz., Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare, Lens culinaris and Brassica rapa it is advised to remove the fallen leaves and bark from the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2663–2864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extract had a stimulatory effect on shoot length of Hordeum vulgare at all concentrations in the laboratory.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
all the concentrations of leaf extracte1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
stimulatorye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“except in Hordeum vulgare where, the stimulatory effect of all the concentrations of leaf extract was observed in shoot length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–962 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 7 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

botanical · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 48 positive, 36 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

botanical · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 34 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.