Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Neem leaf powder preserved lentil seed germination capacity, root length and shoot length at the highest values, significantly.

A claim from Effect Of Preserved Seeds Using Different Botanicals On Seed Quality Of Lentil · 1970

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf powder preserved lentil seed germination capacity, root length and shoot length at the highest values, significantly.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
neem leaf powdere2
Outcome
germination capacity, root length, shoot lengthe3
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
for eight monthse5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seed Quality Of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–78
e2

“The highest values for all these characters except moisture content were significant when the seeds were preserved with neem leaf powder and bishkatali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–834
e3

“germination capacity, root length, shoot length of the seedlings and vigour index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–667
e5

“stored them in earthen pots for eight months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–279

Title

Effect Of Preserved Seeds Using Different Botanicals On Seed Quality Of Lentil

A Khatun; G Kabir; MAH Bhuiyan; et al. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 1970. doi:10.3329/bjar.v36i3.9266

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-784c8ff0b2ca8f669cf257c347e4d5dda1fef60a6fb04187e367a025466128a7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Azadirachta indica · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 7 positive, 14 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.