Abstract
Abstract. Currently, fertilizer is applied uniformly in wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium. Ait) fields, once in a two year production cycle, without considering substantial variation in soil/plant characteristics, topographic features, and fruit yield. The heavy rainfall, gentle to severe topography with high proportion of bare spots, and weed patches in wild blueberry fields emphasizes the need for variable rate split (VRS) fertilization to avoid environmental contamination. Two commercial wild blueberry fields were selected in central Nova Scotia to examine the impact of VRS fertilization on ammonia volatilization losses. Management zones (MZs) were delineated based on slope variation within the selected fields (steep slope (Zone-1), moderate slope (Zone-2), and low slope areas (Zone-3)). The fields were divided into two sections (VRS section and uniform rate (UR) section). Global positioning system (GPS) guided prescription maps based on slope variation were generated in ArcGIS 10 software to apply fertilizer in both fields. In VRS section, fertilizer was applied three times with commercial variable rate (VR) fertilizer spreader in Zone-1, Zone-2, and Zone-3 with fertilization rates of 66, 50, 33, and kg ha-1, respectively. Single uniform grower’s fertilizer rate (200 kg ha-1) was applied in UR sections of the selected fields for comparison. The ammonia volatilization trials were established under VRS and UR fertilized sections of the selected fields immediately following the fertilization. The ammonia volatilization samples were collected after each fertilization in VRS sections and once in UR sections. The samples were analyzed for ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) concentrations. Leaf samples were collected in third week of July at tip-dieback stage and analyzed for leaf nutrient concentrations. The results of repeated measure analysis of variance showed ammonia volatilization losses were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in VRS sections as compared to uniformly fertilized sections of the selected fields. Secondly, the study found that the leaf nutrient concentrations were not reduced using VRS fertilization. Results of this study also indicated that the VRS fertilization improved the nitrogen use efficiency and reduced the ammonia volatilization in wild blueberry fields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Variable rate split fertilization lowered ammonia volatilization losses relative to uniform fertilization.
Verbatim
e0“ammonia volatilization losses were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in VRS sections as compared to uniformly fertilized sections of the selected fields”
e1“wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium. Ait)”
Claim · model-written summary
Variable rate split fertilization did not reduce leaf nutrient concentrations.
- Taxon
- wild blueberrye1
- Treatment
- VRS fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- leaf nutrient concentrationse0
- Direction
- not reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“leaf nutrient concentrations were not reduced using VRS fertilization”
e1“wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium. Ait)”
Claim · model-written summary
Variable rate split fertilization improved nitrogen use efficiency in wild blueberry fields.
- Taxon
- wild blueberrye0
- Treatment
- VRS fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- nitrogen use efficiencye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“VRS fertilization improved the nitrogen use efficiency and reduced the ammonia volatilization in wild blueberry fields”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · nutrient: content · VacciniumPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.