Abstract
A field experiment was carried out to evaluate the effects of two sources of organic manures (Farmyard manure and chicken manure) as main plots and 3 levels of Effective Microorganisms (EM) in foliar application (0, 1, 2 L.fed-1) as sub-plots on soil characteristics and Pea (Pisum sativum L) chemical constituents. Six treatments were arranged in split block design with 3 replicates. Results indicated that using organic manures as FYM and chicken manure recorded the highest values of chlorophyll content, N PK content, crude protein, total carbohydrates, total sugar and vitamin C. In addition, concentrations of NPK mg kg-1 soil were significantly increased with using chicken manures. Also, the results showed that the mean values of all mentioned parameters increased with increasing EM at rate of 2L.fed-1 comparing with the untreated plant. Best results for interaction between the treatments which recorded the highest values were obtained using chicken manure with foliar application of 2L fed-1 EM.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
FYM and chicken manure gave the highest chlorophyll content and NPK content in pea.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L)
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Treatment
- FYM and chicken manuree1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll content, N PK contente1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Setting
- field experimente2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pea (Pisum sativum L)”
e1“using organic manures as FYM and chicken manure recorded the highest values of chlorophyll content, N PK content”
e2“A field experiment was carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM and chicken manure gave the highest crude protein, total carbohydrates and total sugar in pea.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- FYM and chicken manuree1
- Outcome
- crude protein, total carbohydrates, total sugare1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Setting
- field experimente2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pea (Pisum sativum L)”
e1“using organic manures as FYM and chicken manure recorded the highest values of chlorophyll content, N PK content, crude protein, total carbohydrates, total sugar”
e2“A field experiment was carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM and chicken manure gave the highest vitamin C in pea.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- FYM and chicken manuree1
- Outcome
- vitamin Ce1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Setting
- field experimente2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pea (Pisum sativum L)”
e1“using organic manures as FYM and chicken manure recorded the highest values of chlorophyll content, N PK content, crude protein, total carbohydrates, total sugar and vitamin C”
e2“A field experiment was carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing foliar EM at 2 L/fed increased the mean values of all measured pea parameters compared with untreated plants.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- EM at rate of 2L.fed-1e3
- Interactor
- Effective Microorganismse5other
- Outcome
- mean values of all mentioned parameterse3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Comparator
- untreated plante3
- Setting
- field experimente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pea (Pisum sativum L)”
e2“A field experiment was carried out”
e3“the mean values of all mentioned parameters increased with increasing EM at rate of 2L.fed-1 comparing with the untreated plant”
e5“3 levels of Effective Microorganisms (EM) in foliar application”
Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure significantly increased soil concentrations of NPK in pea fields.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- chicken manurese4
- Outcome
- concentrations of NPK mg kg-1 soile4
- Direction
- increasede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pea (Pisum sativum L)”
e4“concentrations of NPK mg kg-1 soil were significantly increased with using chicken manures”
Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure with foliar 2 L/fed EM gave the best pea results, with the highest values.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L)Lathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- chicken manure with foliar application of 2L fed-1 EMe6
- Interactor
- EMe6other
- Outcome
- highest valuese6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Setting
- field experimente2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pea (Pisum sativum L)”
e2“A field experiment was carried out”
e6“Best results for interaction between the treatments which recorded the highest values were obtained using chicken manure with foliar application of 2L fed-1 EM”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.