Paper · 2019 · Photosynthetica

Chlorophyll fluorescence for prediction of yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) susceptibility to drought

K. JUZOŃ; I. CZYCZYŁO-MYSZA; A. OSTROWSKA; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Drought has become an essential environmental factor limiting plant productivity. In order to detect differences in chlorophyll (Chl) a fluorescence, Chl concentration (in SPAD units), and yield parameters of yellow lupin ('Morocco 4' and 'Taper') and pea ('Wenus' and 'SZD165'), drought stress was initiated by withholding water for 14 d (25% of field water capacity). A significant decrease of leaf relative water content was found in tested cultivars. SPAD values did not show significant changes in all cultivars. The maximum photochemical efficiency and area over the Chl a fluorescence induction curve decreased in both species under drought. Performance index in lupin did not change significantly under drought while it declined in pea. Among the tested cultivars, lupin cv. 'Morocco 4' maintained the highest efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus as well as the highest number of pods, seeds per plant, height, and dry mass of shoots under drought conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased leaf relative water content across cultivars.

Taxon
yellow lupint0
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease of leaf relative water content was found in tested cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–453 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress was initiated by withholding water for 14 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–338 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow lupin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD values showed no significant change across cultivars.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
SPAD valuese0
Direction
did not show significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD values did not show significant changes in all cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–516 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress was initiated by withholding water for 14 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–338 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased maximum photochemical efficiency in both species.

Taxon
yellow lupint0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
maximum photochemical efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum photochemical efficiency and area over the Chl a fluorescence induction curve decreased in both species under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow lupin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased area over chlorophyll fluorescence induction curve in both species.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
area over the Chl a fluorescence induction curvee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum photochemical efficiency and area over the Chl a fluorescence induction curve decreased in both species under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lupin performance index did not change significantly under drought.

Taxon
lupinLupinuse0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Performance indexe0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Performance index in lupin did not change significantly under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea performance index declined under drought.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Performance indexe0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Performance index in lupin did not change significantly under drought while it declined in pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–743 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morocco 4 maintained the highest photosynthetic efficiency under drought.

Taxon
lupinLupinuse0
Material
Morocco 4e0
Outcome
efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatuse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
under drought conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lupin cv. 'Morocco 4' maintained the highest efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus as well as the highest number of pods, seeds per plant, height, and dry mass of shoots under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morocco 4 had the highest pod number, seeds per plant, height and shoot dry mass under drought.

Taxon
lupinLupinuse0
Material
Morocco 4e0
Outcome
number of pods, seeds per plant, height, and dry mass of shootse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lupin cv. 'Morocco 4' maintained the highest efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus as well as the highest number of pods, seeds per plant, height, and dry mass of shoots under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–972 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.