Paper · 2019 · Plant Biotechnology Journal

Genome sequencing of the Australian wild diploid species Gossypium australe highlights disease resistance and delayed gland morphogenesis

Yingfan Cai; Xiaoyan Cai; Qinglian Wang; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
107
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The diploid wild cotton species Gossypium australe possesses excellent traits including resistance to disease and delayed gland morphogenesis, and has been successfully used for distant breeding programmes to incorporate disease resistance traits into domesticated cotton. Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome by integrating PacBio, Illumina short read, BioNano (DLS) and Hi-C technologies, and acquired a high-quality reference genome with a contig N50 of 1.83 Mb and a scaffold N50 of 143.60 Mb. We found that 73.5% of the G. australe genome is composed of various repeat sequences, differing from those of G. arboreum (85.39%), G. hirsutum (69.86%) and G. barbadense (69.83%). The G. australe genome showed closer collinear relationships with the genome of G. arboreum than G. raimondii and has undergone less extensive genome reorganization than the G. arboreum genome. Selection signature and transcriptomics analyses implicated multiple genes in disease resistance responses, including GauCCD7 and GauCBP1, and experiments revealed induction of both genes by Verticillium dahliae and by the plant hormones strigolactone (GR24), salicylic acid (SA) and methyl jasmonate (MeJA). Experiments using a Verticillium-resistant domesticated G. barbadense cultivar confirmed that knockdown of the homologues of these genes caused a significant reduction in resistance against Verticillium dahliae. Moreover, knockdown of a newly identified gland-associated gene GauGRAS1 caused a glandless phenotype in partial tissues using G. australe. The G. australe genome represents a valuable resource for cotton research and distant relative breeding as well as for understanding the evolutionary history of crop genomes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The G. australe genome assembly reached a contig N50 of 1.83 Mb.

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Outcome
contig N50e2
Value
1.83 Mbe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“acquired a high-quality reference genome with a contig N50 of 1.83 Mb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–469 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The G. australe genome reached a scaffold N50 of 143.60 Mb.

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Outcome
scaffold N50e2
Value
143.60 Mbe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“a scaffold N50 of 143.60 Mb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–501 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeat sequences make up 73.5% of the G. australe genome.

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Outcome
repeat sequencese2
Value
73.5%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“We found that 73.5% of the G. australe genome is composed of various repeat sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. australe repeat content differs from that of G. arboreum (85.39%).

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Outcome
repeat sequencese2
Qualifier
85.39%e3
Comparator
G. arboreume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“We found that 73.5% of the G. australe genome is composed of various repeat sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–588 · show in text ↑
e3

“differing from those of G. arboreum (85.39%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. australe repeat content differs from that of G. hirsutum (69.86%).

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Outcome
repeat sequencese2
Qualifier
69.86%e3
Comparator
G. hirsutume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“We found that 73.5% of the G. australe genome is composed of various repeat sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–588 · show in text ↑
e3

“G. hirsutum (69.86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. australe repeat content differs from that of G. barbadense (69.83%).

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Outcome
repeat sequencese2
Qualifier
69.83%e3
Comparator
G. barbadensee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“We found that 73.5% of the G. australe genome is composed of various repeat sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–588 · show in text ↑
e3

“G. barbadense (69.83%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–683 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The G. australe genome shows closer collinearity with G. arboreum than with G. raimondii.

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Outcome
collinear relationshipse1
Comparator
G. raimondiie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The G. australe genome showed closer collinear relationships with the genome of G. arboreum than G. raimondii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–794 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. australe has undergone less extensive genome reorganization than G. arboreum.

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Outcome
genome reorganizatione2
Direction
less extensivee2
Comparator
G. arboreume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The G. australe genome showed closer collinear relationships with the genome of G. arboreum than G. raimondii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–794 · show in text ↑
e2

“has undergone less extensive genome reorganization than the G. arboreum genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–877 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection and transcriptomic analyses implicate GauCCD7 and GauCBP1 in disease-resistance responses.

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Gene
GauCCD7 and GauCBP1e2
Outcome
disease resistance responsese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“Selection signature and transcriptomics analyses implicated multiple genes in disease resistance responses, including GauCCD7 and GauCBP1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verticillium dahliae induces expression of GauCCD7 and GauCBP1 in G. australe.

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Treatment
Verticillium dahliaee2
Interactor
Verticillium dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee2pathogen
Outcome
both genese2
Direction
inductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“experiments revealed induction of both genes by Verticillium dahliae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant hormones strigolactone (GR24), salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate induce expression of GauCCD7 and GauCBP1 in G. australe.

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Treatment
strigolactone (GR24), salicylic acid (SA) and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)e2
Outcome
both genese2
Direction
inductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, we sequenced the G. australe genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–314 · show in text ↑
e2

“experiments revealed induction of both genes by Verticillium dahliae and by the plant hormones strigolactone (GR24), salicylic acid (SA) and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Knockdown of the homologues of GauCCD7 and GauCBP1 significantly reduced resistance to Verticillium dahliae in a G. barbadense cultivar.

Taxon
G. barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Treatment
knockdown of the homologues of these genese1
Interactor
Verticillium dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee1pathogen
Outcome
resistance against Verticillium dahliaee1
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Experiments using a Verticillium-resistant domesticated G. barbadense cultivar confirmed that knockdown of the homologues of these genes caused a significant reduction in resistance against Verticillium dahliae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1398 · show in text ↑
e2

“Experiments using a Verticillium-resistant domesticated G. barbadense cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Knockdown of GauGRAS1 caused a glandless phenotype in partial tissues of G. australe.

Taxon
G. australeGossypium australee1
Treatment
knockdown of a newly identified gland-associated gene GauGRAS1e1
Gene
GauGRAS1e1
Outcome
glandless phenotypee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium australe
Gossypium australe · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMark Marathon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“knockdown of a newly identified gland-associated gene GauGRAS1 caused a glandless phenotype in partial tissues using G. australe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1538 · show in text ↑