Paper · 2019 · Greener Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition

Evaluation of Wheat Varieties/Lines for Salt Tolerance at Different Growth Stages

Nekir Bethel; Mamo Lemma; Worku Ashenafi; et al.

18
claims
35
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant scientist, to overcome soil salinity have adopted various strategies, one of the important strategy is to exploit genetic variability of the available germplasm to identify a tolerant genotype that may sustain a reasonable yield on salt affected soils. In this experiment, forty six wheat varieties were screened for salt tolerance on germination, seedling and production stage at laboratory, lath house and field growth stages at different salt levels, respectively. Treatments included at laboratory were control and sodium chloride (NaCl) at various EC levels (10, 20 and 30 ds/m) and at lath house the treatments were control, 10 and 20 dS/m salt concentrations prepared from NaCl. Results indicate that the wheat varieties, Botitho #29, Tay # 14, Shorima # 14, Meda-wolabu # 35, K 6290 (bulk), ETBW–5879, Hidassie and ETBW - 6095 were relatively tolerant at germination and seedling stage in most of the growth parameters studied. Generally when the level of salt increase, most of wheat growth and yield parameters were decreased. In further screening under saline soil plant height, spike length, seed number/spike, root length and grain yield were showed significant difference among tested wheat varieties. ETBW-7879 and HIDASIE were the varieties that gave highest grain yield, while K-6290 and MEDE-WELABU varieties were appeared inferior other than tested wheat varieties grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botitho #29 was relatively salt tolerant at germination and seedling stages.

Material
Botitho #29e0
Organ / stage
germination and seedling stagee0
Outcome
relatively tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botitho #29, Tay # 14, Shorima # 14, Meda-wolabu # 35, K 6290 (bulk), ETBW–5879, Hidassie and ETBW - 6095 were relatively tolerant at germination and seedling stage in most of the growth parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tay # 14 was relatively salt tolerant at germination and seedling stages.

Material
Tay # 14e0
Organ / stage
germination and seedling stagee0
Outcome
relatively tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botitho #29, Tay # 14, Shorima # 14, Meda-wolabu # 35, K 6290 (bulk), ETBW–5879, Hidassie and ETBW - 6095 were relatively tolerant at germination and seedling stage in most of the growth parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorima # 14 was relatively salt tolerant at germination and seedling stages.

Material
Shorima # 14e0
Organ / stage
germination and seedling stagee0
Outcome
relatively tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botitho #29, Tay # 14, Shorima # 14, Meda-wolabu # 35, K 6290 (bulk), ETBW–5879, Hidassie and ETBW - 6095 were relatively tolerant at germination and seedling stage in most of the growth parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meda-wolabu # 35 was relatively salt tolerant at germination and seedling stages.

Material
Meda-wolabu # 35e0
Organ / stage
germination and seedling stagee0
Outcome
relatively tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botitho #29, Tay # 14, Shorima # 14, Meda-wolabu # 35, K 6290 (bulk), ETBW–5879, Hidassie and ETBW - 6095 were relatively tolerant at germination and seedling stage in most of the growth parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K 6290 (bulk) was relatively salt tolerant at germination and seedling stages.

Material
K 6290 (bulk)e0
Organ / stage
germination and seedling stagee0
Outcome
relatively tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botitho #29, Tay # 14, Shorima # 14, Meda-wolabu # 35, K 6290 (bulk), ETBW–5879, Hidassie and ETBW - 6095 were relatively tolerant at germination and seedling stage in most of the growth parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ETBW–5879 was relatively salt tolerant at germination and seedling stages.

Material
ETBW–5879e0
Organ / stage
germination and seedling stagee0
Outcome
relatively tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botitho #29, Tay # 14, Shorima # 14, Meda-wolabu # 35, K 6290 (bulk), ETBW–5879, Hidassie and ETBW - 6095 were relatively tolerant at germination and seedling stage in most of the growth parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hidassie was relatively salt tolerant at germination and seedling stages.

Material
Hidassiee0
Organ / stage
germination and seedling stagee0
Outcome
relatively tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botitho #29, Tay # 14, Shorima # 14, Meda-wolabu # 35, K 6290 (bulk), ETBW–5879, Hidassie and ETBW - 6095 were relatively tolerant at germination and seedling stage in most of the growth parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ETBW - 6095 was relatively salt tolerant at germination and seedling stages.

Material
ETBW - 6095e0
Organ / stage
germination and seedling stagee0
Outcome
relatively tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botitho #29, Tay # 14, Shorima # 14, Meda-wolabu # 35, K 6290 (bulk), ETBW–5879, Hidassie and ETBW - 6095 were relatively tolerant at germination and seedling stage in most of the growth parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt levels decreased most wheat growth and yield parameters.

Treatment
level of salt increasee0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the level of salt increase, most of wheat growth and yield parameters were decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

plant height differed significantly among wheat varieties under saline soil.

Outcome
plant heighte0
Setting
saline soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under saline soil plant height, spike length, seed number/spike, root length and grain yield were showed significant difference among tested wheat varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

spike length differed significantly among wheat varieties under saline soil.

Outcome
spike lengthe0
Setting
saline soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under saline soil plant height, spike length, seed number/spike, root length and grain yield were showed significant difference among tested wheat varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

seed number/spike differed significantly among wheat varieties under saline soil.

Outcome
seed number/spikee0
Setting
saline soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under saline soil plant height, spike length, seed number/spike, root length and grain yield were showed significant difference among tested wheat varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

root length differed significantly among wheat varieties under saline soil.

Outcome
root lengthe0
Setting
saline soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under saline soil plant height, spike length, seed number/spike, root length and grain yield were showed significant difference among tested wheat varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

grain yield differed significantly among wheat varieties under saline soil.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Setting
saline soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under saline soil plant height, spike length, seed number/spike, root length and grain yield were showed significant difference among tested wheat varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ETBW-7879 had highest grain yield among the tested wheat varieties.

Material
ETBW-7879e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETBW-7879 and HIDASIE were the varieties that gave highest grain yield, while K-6290 and MEDE-WELABU varieties were appeared inferior other than tested wheat varieties grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HIDASIE had highest grain yield among the tested wheat varieties.

Material
HIDASIEe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETBW-7879 and HIDASIE were the varieties that gave highest grain yield, while K-6290 and MEDE-WELABU varieties were appeared inferior other than tested wheat varieties grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K-6290 had inferior grain yield among the tested wheat varieties.

Material
K-6290e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
inferiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETBW-7879 and HIDASIE were the varieties that gave highest grain yield, while K-6290 and MEDE-WELABU varieties were appeared inferior other than tested wheat varieties grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MEDE-WELABU had inferior grain yield among the tested wheat varieties.

Material
MEDE-WELABUe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
inferiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETBW-7879 and HIDASIE were the varieties that gave highest grain yield, while K-6290 and MEDE-WELABU varieties were appeared inferior other than tested wheat varieties grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.