Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Salt-primed wheat had higher productivity than shock-only wheat.

A claim from Agronomical, physiological and molecular evaluation reveals superior salt-tolerance in bread wheat through salt-induced priming approach · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-primed wheat had higher productivity than shock-only wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
salt-pretreated group (priming+shock)e0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-pretreated (shock only)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher productivity in the salt-pretreated group (priming+shock) plants than the non-pretreated (shock only).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–955
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–98

Title

Agronomical, physiological and molecular evaluation reveals superior salt-tolerance in bread wheat through salt-induced priming approach

Othman ALZAHRANI; Heba ABOUSEADAA; Taghreed K. ABDELMONEIM; et al. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2021. doi:10.15835/nbha49212310

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-dc11fe20f660fac36bec249cbf1cc2b64866500d1f0d442862e6e209434a3b5f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 197 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

218 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

292 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.