Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Effect of Vegetal- and Seaweed Extract-Based Biostimulants on Agronomical and Leaf Quality Traits of Plastic Tunnel-Grown Baby Lettuce under Four Regimes of Nitrogen Fertilization

Ida Di Mola; Eugenio Cozzolino; Lucia Ottaiano; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
115
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) fertilizers play a crucial role in agriculture, representing a powerful tool for farmers for increasing yields throughout the seasons under both optimal and suboptimal conditions. At the same time, their synthetic/chemical nature could have several influences on ecosystems and human health. For this reason, there is an urgent need to find new and more sustainable means of production to increase plant productivity and optimize nitrogen use. An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop to the foliar application of three plant biostimulants (PBs): Legume-derived protein hydrolysate (LDPH) ‘Trainer®’, tropical plant extract (TPE) ‘Auxym®’ and seaweed extract (SwE) from Ecklonia maxima ‘Kelpak®’ under different N rates of 0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1. The responses of baby lettuce plants were assessed in terms of yield, growth parameters and physicochemical composition of the leaves. The fresh yield of baby lettuce in both biostimulant-treated and untreated plants was positively affected by increasing N rates from 0 to 20 kg N·ha−1, reaching a plateau thereafter indicating luxury N conditions at 30 kg N·ha−1. However, high N fertilizer application (20 and especially 30 kg N·ha−1) resulted in undesirable decreases in antioxidant activities and total ascorbic acid (TAA). Under non-fertilized regimens, foliar PBs application boost growth and yield of baby lettuce in comparison to non-treated plants. Foliar spray with LDPH and especially SwE elicited significant increases in marketable fresh yield (averaging 14%, 6% and 7% at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1, respectively) compared to TPE and untreated plants. Improved agronomical performance of baby lettuce under optimal (10 kg N ha−1) and especially suboptimal N regimens (0 kg N ha−1) was associated with increasing photochemical efficiency and a better activity of photosystem II (higher Soil Plant Analysis Development-SPAD index and chlorophyllous pigments biosynthesis). The application of LDPH enhanced antioxidant capacity and TAA in baby lettuce leaf and did not increased nitrate content as recorded in SwE and TPE treatments. Overall, plant biostimulants may be considered as a sustainable tool of production to increase leafy vegetable productivity in low fertility soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh yield of baby lettuce was positively affected by increasing N rates from 0 to 20 kg N·ha−1 and reached a plateau at 30 kg N·ha−1.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Treatment
increasing N rates from 0 to 20 kg N·ha−1e1
Outcome
fresh yielde1
Direction
positively affectede1
Qualifier
reaching a plateau thereaftere1
Setting
plastic tunnele0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fresh yield of baby lettuce in both biostimulant-treated and untreated plants was positively affected by increasing N rates from 0 to 20 kg N·ha−1, reaching a plateau thereafter indicating luxury N conditions at 30 kg N·ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N fertilizer application (20 and 30 kg N·ha−1) decreased antioxidant activities and total ascorbic acid (TAA) of baby lettuce.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Treatment
high N fertilizer application (20 and especially 30 kg N·ha−1)e2
Outcome
antioxidant activities and total ascorbic acid (TAA)e2
Direction
decreasese2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e2

“high N fertilizer application (20 and especially 30 kg N·ha−1) resulted in undesirable decreases in antioxidant activities and total ascorbic acid (TAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under non-fertilized regimens, foliar plant biostimulants increased growth and yield of baby lettuce compared with non-treated plants.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Treatment
foliar PBs applicatione3
Outcome
growth and yielde3
Direction
booste3
Qualifier
Under non-fertilized regimense3
Comparator
non-treated plantse3

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under non-fertilized regimens, foliar PBs application boost growth and yield of baby lettuce in comparison to non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar LDPH and especially SwE significantly increased marketable fresh yield of baby lettuce by 14% at 10 kg N·ha−1 compared with TPE and untreated plants.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Treatment
Foliar spray with LDPH and especially SwEe4
Outcome
marketable fresh yielde4
Direction
significant increasese4
Value
14%e4
Qualifier
at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1, respectivelye4
Comparator
TPE and untreated plantse4
Setting
plastic tunnele0

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar spray with LDPH and especially SwE elicited significant increases in marketable fresh yield (averaging 14%, 6% and 7% at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1, respectively) compared to TPE and untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar LDPH and especially SwE significantly increased marketable fresh yield of baby lettuce by 6% at 20 kg N·ha−1 compared with TPE and untreated plants.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Treatment
Foliar spray with LDPH and especially SwEe4
Outcome
marketable fresh yielde4
Direction
significant increasese4
Value
6%e4
Qualifier
at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1, respectivelye4
Comparator
TPE and untreated plantse4
Setting
plastic tunnele0

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar spray with LDPH and especially SwE elicited significant increases in marketable fresh yield (averaging 14%, 6% and 7% at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1, respectively) compared to TPE and untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar LDPH and especially SwE significantly increased marketable fresh yield of baby lettuce by 7% at 30 kg N·ha−1 compared with TPE and untreated plants.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Treatment
Foliar spray with LDPH and especially SwEe4
Outcome
marketable fresh yielde4
Direction
significant increasese4
Value
7%e4
Qualifier
at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1, respectivelye4
Comparator
TPE and untreated plantse4
Setting
plastic tunnele0

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar spray with LDPH and especially SwE elicited significant increases in marketable fresh yield (averaging 14%, 6% and 7% at 10, 20 and 30 kg N·ha−1, respectively) compared to TPE and untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1676 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved agronomical performance of baby lettuce under optimal and suboptimal N regimens was associated with increasing photochemical efficiency and a better activity of photosystem II.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Treatment
optimal (10 kg N ha−1) and especially suboptimal N regimens (0 kg N ha−1)e5
Outcome
agronomical performancee5
Direction
Improvede5
Qualifier
increasing photochemical efficiency and a better activity of photosystem IIe5

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e5

“Improved agronomical performance of baby lettuce under optimal (10 kg N ha−1) and especially suboptimal N regimens (0 kg N ha−1) was associated with increasing photochemical efficiency and a better activity of photosystem II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1902 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under optimal and suboptimal N regimens, baby lettuce had higher SPAD index and chlorophyllous pigments biosynthesis associated with improved agronomical performance.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Treatment
optimal (10 kg N ha−1) and especially suboptimal N regimens (0 kg N ha−1)e5
Outcome
SPAD indexe6
Direction
highere6
Qualifier
chlorophyllous pigments biosynthesise6

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e5

“Improved agronomical performance of baby lettuce under optimal (10 kg N ha−1) and especially suboptimal N regimens (0 kg N ha−1) was associated with increasing photochemical efficiency and a better activity of photosystem II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1902 · show in text ↑
e6

“higher Soil Plant Analysis Development-SPAD index and chlorophyllous pigments biosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–1994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The application of LDPH enhanced antioxidant capacity and TAA in baby lettuce leaf.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Organ / stage
leafe7
Treatment
LDPHe7
Outcome
antioxidant capacity and TAAe7
Direction
enhancede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e7

“The application of LDPH enhanced antioxidant capacity and TAA in baby lettuce leaf and did not increased nitrate content as recorded in SwE and TPE treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The application of LDPH did not increase nitrate content of baby lettuce, unlike SwE and TPE treatments.

Taxon
baby lettucee0
Treatment
LDPHe7
Outcome
nitrate contente7
Direction
did not increasede7
Comparator
SwE and TPE treatmentse7

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e7

“The application of LDPH enhanced antioxidant capacity and TAA in baby lettuce leaf and did not increased nitrate content as recorded in SwE and TPE treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2155 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Plant biostimulants may be considered a sustainable tool to increase leafy vegetable productivity in low fertility soils.

Taxon
leafy vegetablee7
Treatment
plant biostimulantse7
Outcome
leafy vegetable productivitye7
Setting
low fertility soilse7

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel to assess the response of baby lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–548 · show in text ↑
e7

“plant biostimulants may be considered as a sustainable tool of production to increase leafy vegetable productivity in low fertility soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2166–2303 · show in text ↑

application · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

other · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

application · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 39 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 61 positive, 18 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.