Paper · 1997 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Trials to Reduce Nitrate and Oxalate Content in Some Leafy Vegetables. 2. Interactive Effects of the Manipulating of the Soil Nutrient Supply, Different Blanching Media and Preservation Methods Followed by Cooking Process

A A Bakr; Ragaa A Gawish

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were carried out to find ways to prevent undesirably high nitrate contents in lettuce and high nitrate and oxalate contents in spinach. Treatments included manipulating the soil nutrient supply and the effects of processing and cooking on the reduction of nitrate and oxalate contents, and the maintenance of vitamins and minerals in the spinach. Best lettuce and spinach qualities, ie highest vitamin and mineral contents with lowest nitrate and oxalate levels, were achieved by fertilising them either with farm yard manure (FYM) or Ca(NO3)2+(NH4)2SO4(1: 1)+N-serve (nitrification inhibitor), at the rate of 178·5 kg N ha-1. High spinach yields were also obtained by fertilisation with urea at 178·5 kg N ha-1, but resulted in high nitrate and oxalate levels. Losses of vitamins A, B1, B2, niacin and C as well as minerals Ca, Fe, Mg, Na, K and P from spinach were smaller following freezing compared with canning, especially when 0·1% calcium citrate and 0·01% sodium ascorbate solutions were used for blanching at ∽77°C for 2 min. © 1997 SCI.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm yard manure gave the best lettuce and spinach quality.

Taxon
lettuce and spinachSpinacia oleraceaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
farm yard manure (FYM)e0
Outcome
highest vitamin and mineral contents with lowest nitrate and oxalate levelse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Best lettuce and spinach qualities, ie highest vitamin and mineral contents with lowest nitrate and oxalate levels, were achieved by fertilising them either with farm yard manure (FYM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed fertilizer with nitrification inhibitor gave the best lettuce and spinach quality.

Taxon
lettuce and spinachSpinacia oleraceaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Ca(NO3)2+(NH4)2SO4(1: 1)+N-serve (nitrification inhibitor), at the rate of 178·5 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
highest vitamin and mineral contents with lowest nitrate and oxalate levelse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Best lettuce and spinach qualities, ie highest vitamin and mineral contents with lowest nitrate and oxalate levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ca(NO3)2+(NH4)2SO4(1: 1)+N-serve (nitrification inhibitor), at the rate of 178·5 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea produced high spinach yields.

Treatment
urea at 178·5 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
spinach yieldse0
Direction
Highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High spinach yields were also obtained by fertilisation with urea at 178·5 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea resulted in high nitrate and oxalate levels in spinach.

Treatment
urea at 178·5 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
nitrate and oxalate levelse0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach yields were also obtained by fertilisation with urea at 178·5 kg N ha-1, but resulted in high nitrate and oxalate levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing preserved spinach vitamins better than canning, especially with the specified blanching solutions.

Treatment
freezinge0
Outcome
Losses of vitamins A, B1, B2, niacin and Ce0
Direction
smallere0
Qualifier
especially when 0·1% calcium citrate and 0·01% sodium ascorbate solutions were used for blanching at ∽77°C for 2 mine0
Comparator
canninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Losses of vitamins A, B1, B2, niacin and C as well as minerals Ca, Fe, Mg, Na, K and P from spinach were smaller following freezing compared with canning, especially when 0·1% calcium citrate and 0·01% sodium ascorbate solutions were used for blanching at ∽77°C for 2 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing preserved spinach minerals better than canning.

Treatment
freezinge0
Outcome
minerals Ca, Fe, Mg, Na, K and Pe0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
canninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Losses of vitamins A, B1, B2, niacin and C as well as minerals Ca, Fe, Mg, Na, K and P from spinach were smaller following freezing compared with canning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–927 · show in text ↑

nitrification inhibitor · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

cold · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cold · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 21 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.