Paper · 2016 · HortScience

Vermicompost Affects Soil Properties and Spinach Growth, Physiology, and Nutritional Value

Chenping Xu; Beiquan Mou

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
46
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The use of vermicompost to improve soil fertility and enhance crop yield has gained considerable momentum due to its contribution to agroecological sustainability. Short-term (35 days after transplanting) effects of vermicompost, applied either as a soil amendment (5% and 10%, v/v) or a drench (40 mL of vermicompost extract at 0, 14, 21, and 28 days after transplanting), on soil properties and spinach plants ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were evaluated in a greenhouse. After harvesting, the amendments left high residual levels of nutrients, organic matter and carbon, and increased soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) and water-holding capacity (WHC). Drench treatment of unamended soil increased soil nutrients, CEC, and WHC. All vermicompost treatments, especially amendment at 10% rate, increased leaf number, area, fresh and dry weight (FW and DW), shoot FW and DW, root DW, and water use efficiency (WUE). Vermicompost increased leaf chlorophyll content, and photochemical efficiency, yield, and electron transport rate (ETR) of mature leaves, as well as increased leaf succulence, and carotenoid, protein, and amino acid content. Vermicompost soil amendment reduced phenolics and flavonoids, leading to lower antioxidant capacity, whereas drench treatment only decreased betacyanin content. Vermicompost improved soil fertility, prompted leaf production, delayed leaf senescence, and enhanced growth of spinach. It also favorably influenced spinach quality by increasing leaf succulence and carotenoid, protein, and amino acids content, although it, as soil amendment, reduced flavonoid content leading to low antioxidant capacity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost amendments increased residual soil nutrients, organic matter, carbon, CEC, and water holding capacity.

Treatment
amendmentse0
Outcome
nutrients, organic matter and carbon, and increased soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) and water-holding capacity (WHC)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the amendments left high residual levels of nutrients, organic matter and carbon, and increased soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) and water-holding capacity (WHC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drenching unamended soil increased soil nutrients, CEC, and WHC.

Treatment
Drench treatmente0
Outcome
soil nutrients, CEC, and WHCe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unamended soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Drench treatment of unamended soil increased soil nutrients, CEC, and WHC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased spinach leaf number, area, leaf and shoot weights, root dry weight, and water use efficiency.

Treatment
vermicompost treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf number, area, fresh and dry weight (FW and DW), shoot FW and DW, root DW, and water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All vermicompost treatments, especially amendment at 10% rate, increased leaf number, area, fresh and dry weight (FW and DW), shoot FW and DW, root DW, and water use efficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased chlorophyll and photochemical measures of mature spinach leaves.

Organ / stage
mature leavese0
Treatment
Vermicomposte0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content, and photochemical efficiency, yield, and electron transport rate (ETR)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost increased leaf chlorophyll content, and photochemical efficiency, yield, and electron transport rate (ETR) of mature leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased spinach leaf succulence, carotenoids, protein, and amino acids.

Treatment
Vermicomposte0
Outcome
leaf succulence, and carotenoid, protein, and amino acid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost increased leaf chlorophyll content, and photochemical efficiency, yield, and electron transport rate (ETR) of mature leaves, as well as increased leaf succulence, and carotenoid, protein, and amino acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment reduced phenolics and flavonoids and lowered antioxidant capacity.

Treatment
Vermicompost soil amendmente0
Outcome
phenolics and flavonoidse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost soil amendment reduced phenolics and flavonoids, leading to lower antioxidant capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost drench decreased betacyanin content.

Treatment
drench treatmente0
Outcome
betacyanin contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drench treatment only decreased betacyanin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost delayed spinach leaf senescence.

Treatment
Vermicompostt0
Outcome
leaf senescencee0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delayed leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vermicompost Affects Soil Properties and Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑

other · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · soil: physics · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.