Paper · 2022 · Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi

Effects of Different Organic Fertilizers on Plant Growth, Yield, Quality Properties and Element Contents in Spinach

Özgül YAMAN TÜRKKAN; Beyhan KİBAR

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of different organic fertilizers on plant growth, yield, quality properties and element contents in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). The research was carried out under open field conditions in Bolu province. In the study, Matador spinach variety was used and seven different applications were examined. The applications were as follows: 1) Control, 2) Chicken manure, 3) Turkey manure, 4) Sheep manure, 5) Cattle manure, 6) Vermicompost and 7) Chemical fertilizer. The experiment was established in randomized complete block design with three replications. According to the research findings, significant differences were found among the applications. In general, organic fertilizer applications significantly increased yield, plant height, plant wet weight, plant dry weight, dry matter content, number of marketable leaves, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur and selenium contents of the plant in comparison with control and chemical fertilizer. The highest yield was determined in cattle manure application. It was observed that cattle manure increased the yield by 88.08% compared to the control and increased the yield by 41.16% compared to the chemical fertilizer. In organic fertilizer applications, heavy metal contents such as arsenic, chrome, cobalt, and nickel were found to be lower than the control and, aluminum and cadmium contents were found to be lower than chemical fertilizer. As a result, it was determined that organic fertilizers examined in the study have positive effects on plant growth, yield, quality properties and element contents of spinach and organic fertilizers can be used successfully for sustainable agriculture in spinach cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers increased growth and yield traits.

Treatment
organic fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
yield, plant height, plant wet weight, plant dry weight, dry matter content, number of marketable leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and chemical fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilizer applications significantly increased yield, plant height, plant wet weight, plant dry weight, dry matter content, number of marketable leaves, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur and selenium contents of the plant in comparison with control and chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers increased N, P, S and Se contents.

Treatment
organic fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur and selenium contents of the plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and chemical fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilizer applications significantly increased yield, plant height, plant wet weight, plant dry weight, dry matter content, number of marketable leaves, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur and selenium contents of the plant in comparison with control and chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure produced highest yield.

Treatment
cattle manure applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was determined in cattle manure application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure increased yield by 88.08% over control.

Treatment
cattle manuree0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
88.08%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cattle manure increased the yield by 88.08% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers lowered As, Cr, Co and Ni contents.

Treatment
organic fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
arsenic, chrome, cobalt, and nickele0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In organic fertilizer applications, heavy metal contents such as arsenic, chrome, cobalt, and nickel were found to be lower than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1355 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–180 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend organic fertilizers for sustainable spinach cultivation.

Outcome
used successfully for sustainable agriculture in spinach cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilizers can be used successfully for sustainable agriculture in spinach cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1714 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 53 positive, 7 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.