Paper · 2018 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Different water and nitrogen fertilizer rates effects on growth and development of spinach

Jinxiu Zhang; Zhenning Liang; Dongmei Jiao; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water and nitrogen (N) nutrition are two key factors affecting nutrient absorption growth and biomass production of vegetables. However, less information is available to the interaction between water utilization and nitrogen use efficiency in vegetable production. In this study, a combination of three water levels and three nitrogen fertilizer rates was applied to optimize water and nitrogen application in field experiments. Plant traits, biomass production, and allocation were determined. The fresh and dry weight of leaf, stem, and root significantly decreased when irrigation water was short. Total aboveground biomass decreased in response to deficit irrigation. Leaf chlorophyll concentrations decreased when nitrogen fertilizer reduced. The leaf area was highest when spinach was grown under 170 kg ha−1 of nitrogen fertilizer and 70–80% of field capacity. These results suggested that spinach could be planted with good growth and quality by implementing effective water and nitrogen managements.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Short irrigation significantly reduced fresh and dry weights of spinach leaves, stems and roots.

Treatment
irrigation water was shorte0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of leaf, stem, and roote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fresh and dry weight of leaf, stem, and root significantly decreased when irrigation water was short.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased total aboveground biomass.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
Total aboveground biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total aboveground biomass decreased in response to deficit irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrogen fertilizer decreased leaf chlorophyll concentrations.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer reducede0
Outcome
Leaf chlorophyll concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll concentrations decreased when nitrogen fertilizer reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area was highest at 170 kg ha−1 nitrogen and 70–80% field capacity.

Treatment
170 kg ha−1 of nitrogen fertilizer and 70–80% of field capacitye0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf area was highest when spinach was grown under 170 kg ha−1 of nitrogen fertilizer and 70–80% of field capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest effective water and nitrogen management for good spinach growth and quality.

Treatment
effective water and nitrogen managementse0
Outcome
good growth and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggested that spinach could be planted with good growth and quality by implementing effective water and nitrogen managements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.