Paper · 2019 · HortTechnology

Applying Wollastonite to Soil to Adjust pH and Suppress Powdery Mildew on Pumpkin

Yuan Li; Arend-Jan Both; Christian A. Wyenandt; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Although not considered an essential nutrient, silicon (Si) can be beneficial to plants. Si accumulator species such as pumpkin ( Cucurbita pepo var. pepo ) can absorb Si from soil. Si uptake may reduce plant susceptibility to fungal diseases such as cucurbit powdery mildew ( Podosphaera xanthii and Erysiphe cichoracearum ). We previously reported that wollastonite, an Organic Materials Reviews Institute–approved natural mineral, can increase soil Si level, increase soil pH, provide pumpkin plants with Si, and increase their resistance to powdery mildew. In this study, we examined the optimum application rate of wollastonite for pumpkins grown in pots and exposed to cucurbit powdery mildew. We confirmed that wollastonite has liming capabilities similar to regular limestone. Regardless of the application rates, wollastonite and limestone showed similar effects on soil chemistry and plant mineral composition. Pumpkin plants grown with the lower doses of wollastonite amendments (3.13 and 6.25 tons/acre) had the greatest tissue Si concentrations and demonstrated the greatest disease resistance. We conclude that wollastonite is a useful material for organic cucurbit (Cucurbitaceae) growers who want to increase soil pH and improve plant resistance to powdery mildew at the same time. Applying wollastonite at rates beyond the amount required to achieve a desirable soil pH for pumpkin production did not further increase Si uptake, nor did it further suppress powdery mildew development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wollastonite had liming capability similar to limestone.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
wollastonitee0
Outcome
liming capabilitiese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
regular limestonee0

Verbatim

e0

“wollastonite has liming capabilities similar to regular limestone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wollastonite and limestone similarly affected soil chemistry and pumpkin mineral composition at all rates.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
wollastonitee0
Outcome
soil chemistry and plant mineral compositione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
limestonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of the application rates, wollastonite and limestone showed similar effects on soil chemistry and plant mineral composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower wollastonite doses yielded the greatest pumpkin tissue silicon concentrations.

Taxon
Pumpkine0
Treatment
lower doses of wollastonite amendments (3.13 and 6.25 tons/acre)e0
Outcome
tissue Si concentrationse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pumpkin plants grown with the lower doses of wollastonite amendments (3.13 and 6.25 tons/acre) had the greatest tissue Si concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower wollastonite doses yielded the greatest pumpkin disease resistance.

Taxon
Pumpkine0
Treatment
lower doses of wollastonite amendments (3.13 and 6.25 tons/acre)e0
Interactor
Podosphaera xanthiiPodosphaera xanthiie1pathogen
Second interactor
Erysiphe cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearume1pathogen
Outcome
disease resistancee0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Podosphaera xanthii
Podosphaera xanthii · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Golovinomyces cichoracearum
Golovinomyces cichoracearum · Second interactorJames Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pumpkin plants grown with the lower doses of wollastonite amendments (3.13 and 6.25 tons/acre) had the greatest tissue Si concentrations and demonstrated the greatest disease resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1107 · show in text ↑
e1

“powdery mildew ( Podosphaera xanthii and Erysiphe cichoracearum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wollastonite beyond the pH target did not further increase pumpkin silicon uptake.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Treatment
wollastonite at rates beyond the amount required to achieve a desirable soil pHe0
Outcome
Si uptakee0
Direction
did not further increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Applying wollastonite at rates beyond the amount required to achieve a desirable soil pH for pumpkin production did not further increase Si uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wollastonite beyond the pH target did not further suppress powdery mildew.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Treatment
wollastonite at rates beyond the amount required to achieve a desirable soil pHe0
Interactor
Podosphaera xanthiiPodosphaera xanthiie1pathogen
Second interactor
Erysiphe cichoracearumGolovinomyces cichoracearume1pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildew developmente0
Direction
nor did it further suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Podosphaera xanthii
Podosphaera xanthii · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Golovinomyces cichoracearum
Golovinomyces cichoracearum · Second interactorJames Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying wollastonite at rates beyond the amount required to achieve a desirable soil pH for pumpkin production did not further increase Si uptake, nor did it further suppress powdery mildew development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1501 · show in text ↑
e1

“Podosphaera xanthii and Erysiphe cichoracearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–323 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend wollastonite to raise pH and improve mildew resistance in organic cucurbits.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
wollastonitee0
Outcome
increase soil pH and improve plant resistance to powdery mildewe0

Verbatim

e0

“wollastonite is a useful material for organic cucurbit (Cucurbitaceae) growers who want to increase soil pH and improve plant resistance to powdery mildew at the same time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–81 · show in text ↑

Wollastonite · nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Wollastonite · Podosphaera xanthii · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.