Paper · 2019 · The Plant Pathology Journal

Inhibitory Abilities of Bacillus Isolates and Their Culture Filtrates against the Gray Mold Caused by Botrytis cinerea on Postharvest Fruit

Xiaomeng Chen; Yajie Wang; Yu Gao; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
90
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Botrytis cinerea, a major phytopathogenic fungus, has been reported to infect more than 200 crop species worldwide, and it causes massive losses in yield. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory abilities and effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RS-25, Bacillus licheniformis MG-4, Bacillus subtilis Z-14, and Bacillus subtilis Pnf-4 and their culture filtrates and extracts against the gray mold caused by B. cinerea on postharvest tomato, strawberry, and grapefruit. The results revealed that the cells of Z-14, culture filtrate of RS-25, and cells of Z-14 showed the strongest biocontrol activity against the gray mold on the strawberry, grape, and tomato fruit, respectively. All the strains produced volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and the VOCs of Pnf-4 displayed the highest inhibition values. Based on headspace solid-phase microextraction in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, esters accounted for the largest percentage of the VOCs produced by RS-25, MG-4, Z-14, and Pnf-4 (36.80%, 29.58%, 30.78%, and 36.26%, respectively). All the strains showed potent cellulase and protease activities, but no chitinase activity. RS-25, Z-14, and MG-4, but not Pnf-4, grew on chrome azurol S agar, and an orange halo was formed around the colonies. All the strains showed biofilm formation, fruit colonization, and lipopeptide production, which may be the main modes of action of the antagonists against B. cinerea on the fruit. This study provides the basis for developing natural biocontrol agents against the gray mold caused by B. cinerea on postharvest fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z-14 cells gave the strongest control of gray mold on strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
cells of Z-14e0
Interactor
gray molde0pathogen
Second interactor
Z-14e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biocontrol activity against the gray molde0
Direction
strongeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cells of Z-14, culture filtrate of RS-25, and cells of Z-14 showed the strongest biocontrol activity against the gray mold on the strawberry, grape, and tomato fruit, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RS-25 filtrate gave the strongest control of gray mold on grape.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
culture filtrate of RS-25e0
Interactor
gray molde0pathogen
Second interactor
RS-25e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biocontrol activity against the gray molde0
Direction
strongeste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the cells of Z-14, culture filtrate of RS-25, and cells of Z-14 showed the strongest biocontrol activity against the gray mold on the strawberry, grape, and tomato fruit, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z-14 cells gave the strongest control of gray mold on tomato.

Treatment
cells of Z-14e0
Interactor
gray molde0pathogen
Second interactor
Z-14e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biocontrol activity against the gray molde0
Direction
strongeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cells of Z-14, culture filtrate of RS-25, and cells of Z-14 showed the strongest biocontrol activity against the gray mold on the strawberry, grape, and tomato fruit, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–693 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested strains produced volatile compounds, and Pnf-4 volatiles inhibited most strongly.

Taxon
Bacillust0
Interactor
Pnf-4e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
highest inhibition valuese0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“All the strains produced volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and the VOCs of Pnf-4 displayed the highest inhibition values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Esters were the largest share of VOCs from RS-25, MG-4, Z-14 and Pnf-4.

Taxon
Bacillust0
Outcome
esters accounted for the largest percentage of the VOCse0
Direction
largeste0

Verbatim

e0

“esters accounted for the largest percentage of the VOCs produced by RS-25, MG-4, Z-14, and Pnf-4 (36.80%, 29.58%, 30.78%, and 36.26%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All strains showed cellulase and protease activity but no chitinase activity.

Taxon
Bacillust0
Outcome
cellulase and protease activitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“All the strains showed potent cellulase and protease activities, but no chitinase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RS-25, Z-14 and MG-4 grew on chrome azurol S agar with orange halos, but Pnf-4 did not.

Taxon
Bacillust0
Outcome
grew on chrome azurol S agare0

Verbatim

e0

“RS-25, Z-14, and MG-4, but not Pnf-4, grew on chrome azurol S agar, and an orange halo was formed around the colonies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All strains formed biofilms, colonized fruit, and produced lipopeptides.

Taxon
Bacillust0
Outcome
biofilm formation, fruit colonization, and lipopeptide productione0

Verbatim

e0

“All the strains showed biofilm formation, fruit colonization, and lipopeptide production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–32 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed biofilms, fruit colonization and lipopeptides as likely antagonistic modes against Botrytis.

Taxon
Bacillust0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
modes of action of the antagonists against B. cinereae0
Qualifier
biofilm formation, fruit colonization, and lipopeptide productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biofilm formation, fruit colonization, and lipopeptide production, which may be the main modes of action of the antagonists against B. cinerea on the fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–32 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · control · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.