Paper · 2019 · Journal of Agronomy Research

Growth, Yield and Varietal Responses of Cassava to time of Planting into Plantain Stands in a Plantain/Cassava Intercrop in Akure, South-West Nigeria

Aiyelari P.O; Odede A.N; Agele S.O

16
claims
38
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at the Teaching and Research Farms of The Federal University of Technology Akure to evaluate the responses of cassava varieties to time of planting in plantain-based intercropping system in the rainforest zone of Nigeria. The objectives were to identify the more compatible cassava variety for intercrop with plantain examine e the appropriate time to introduce cassava varieties into plantain/cassava intercrop and to identify the more compatible cassava variety for intercrop with plantain. The experiment involved the use of two varieties of cassava (TME 419 non branching and TMS 98/0581 moderately branched) planted at spacing of 1 x 1 m into the alleys of false horn plantain variety space at 3 x 2 m. The treatments were sole plantain, sole cassava varieties (TME 419 poorly branched variety and TMS 0581 branching variety), plantain + he respective cassava varieties (TME 419 and TMS 98/0581) at the same time, and plantain + the respective cassava varieties (TME 419 and TMS 98/0581) at 4 weeks after planting>the treatment plot size was 9 m x 6 m. The plantains and the two cassava varieties were planted sole as the control treatments. The introduction of cassava into plantain as intercrop was carried out at different times which were; at the same time with plantain, and at four (4) weeks after planting plantain. Data on growth parameters such as; plant height, pseudo-stem girth, number of leaves were taken for plantains, while plant height, stem girth, number of leaves, number of branches, height at branching were taken for cassava at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks after planting (WAP). Yield parameters such as; bunch weight, number of fingers, number of hands, length of fingers, girth of fingers, weight of hands, weight of fingers were taken for plantains while number of tubers, weight of tubers, girth of tubers, length of tubers, fresh root yield, shoot biomass, were taken for cassava at harvest. The data collected were subjected to statistical analysis. The results showed a higher growth and yield performance for TME419 (49.2 t/ha) and TMS98/0581 (45.7 t/ha) planted sole, and TME 419 (39.5 t/ha) intercropped at planting compared to TMS 98/0581 (24.4 t/ha) intercropped at planting, TME 419 (21.7 t/ha) and TMS 98/0581 (15.7 t/ha) intercropped at 4 week after planting (WAP), respectively. But there was no significant difference (P<0.05) recorded for the growth of plantain, whereas the yield of sole plantain was higher and differed significantly (P<0.05) from the yields of intercropped plantain. All the treatment combinations had land equivalent ratio (LER) and area time equivalent ratio (ATER) greater than 1. Plantain + TME 419 intercropped at the same time recording the highest LER and ATER (1.48 and 1.5) while plantain + TMS 98/0581 had the least 1.11 and 1.14 respectively. The cost benefit analysis for the treatment combinations showed that TME 419 planted sole had the highest return of ₦3.567 per ₦1 invested, TME 419 intercropped at the same time gave a return of ₦3.416 per ₦1 invested, which was greater than other intercropped treatments. Intercropping cassava with plantain at the same time, as well as the use of TME 419 variety gave the best performance in terms of growth, yield, land equivalent ratio, area time equivalent ratio and returns on investment. This combination are recommended for plantain-based intercropping system involving cassava in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TME419 planted sole yielded 49.2 t/ha.

Material
TME419e0
Treatment
planted solee0
Outcome
yield performancee0
Direction
highere0
Value
49.2 t/hae0
Comparator
intercropped at plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher growth and yield performance for TME419 (49.2 t/ha) and TMS98/0581 (45.7 t/ha) planted sole, and TME 419 (39.5 t/ha) intercropped at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2040–2188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TMS98/0581 planted sole yielded 45.7 t/ha.

Material
TMS98/0581e0
Treatment
planted solee0
Outcome
yieldt1
Value
45.7 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TMS98/0581 (45.7 t/ha) planted sole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TME 419 intercropped at planting yielded 39.5 t/ha.

Material
TME 419e0
Treatment
intercropped at plantinge0
Outcome
yieldt1
Direction
compared toe0
Value
39.5 t/hae0
Comparator
TMS 98/0581e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TME 419 (39.5 t/ha) intercropped at planting compared to TMS 98/0581 (24.4 t/ha) intercropped at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2144–2249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–13 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TMS 98/0581 intercropped at planting yielded 24.4 t/ha.

Material
TMS 98/0581e0
Treatment
intercropped at plantinge0
Outcome
yieldt1
Value
24.4 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TMS 98/0581 (24.4 t/ha) intercropped at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–13 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TME 419 intercropped at 4 week after planting (WAP) yielded 21.7 t/ha.

Material
TME 419e0
Treatment
intercropped at 4 week after planting (WAP)e0
Outcome
yieldt1
Value
21.7 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TME 419 (21.7 t/ha) and TMS 98/0581 (15.7 t/ha) intercropped at 4 week after planting (WAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2251–2342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–13 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TMS 98/0581 intercropped at 4 week after planting (WAP) yielded 15.7 t/ha.

Material
TMS 98/0581e0
Treatment
intercropped at 4 week after planting (WAP)e0
Outcome
yieldt1
Value
15.7 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TMS 98/0581 (15.7 t/ha) intercropped at 4 week after planting (WAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2275–2342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantain growth showed no significant treatment difference.

Taxon
plantainMusa ABB Groupe0
Treatment
intercroppede2
Outcome
growth of plantaine0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
solee1

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference (P<0.05) recorded for the growth of plantain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2362–2442 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plantains and the two cassava varieties were planted sole as the control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1181 · show in text ↑
e2

“TME 419 (39.5 t/ha) intercropped at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2144–2188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole plantain yield significantly exceeded intercropped plantain yield.

Taxon
plantainMusa ABB Groupe0
Treatment
sole plantaine0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropped plantaine0

Verbatim

e0

“yield of sole plantain was higher and differed significantly (P<0.05) from the yields of intercropped plantain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2456–2566 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Every intercrop treatment had land equivalent and area time equivalent ratios above one.

Outcome
land equivalent ratio (LER) and area time equivalent ratio (ATER)e0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatment combinations had land equivalent ratio (LER) and area time equivalent ratio (ATER) greater than 1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2568–2684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plantain/Cassava Intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantain plus TME 419 had the highest LER, 1.48.

Material
TME 419e0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.48e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plantain + TME 419 intercropped at the same time recording the highest LER and ATER (1.48 and 1.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2685–2783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantain plus TME 419 had the highest ATER, 1.5.

Material
TME 419e0
Outcome
ATERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plantain + TME 419 intercropped at the same time recording the highest LER and ATER (1.48 and 1.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2685–2783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantain plus TMS 98/0581 had the least LER, 1.11.

Material
TMS 98/0581e0
Outcome
LERe1
Direction
leaste0
Value
1.11e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plantain + TMS 98/0581 had the least 1.11 and 1.14 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2790–2854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest LER and ATER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2748–2768 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantain plus TMS 98/0581 had the least ATER, 1.14.

Material
TMS 98/0581e0
Outcome
ATERe1
Direction
leaste0
Value
1.14e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plantain + TMS 98/0581 had the least 1.11 and 1.14 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2790–2854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest LER and ATER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2748–2768 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TME 419 returned ₦3.567 per ₦1 invested.

Material
TME 419e0
Outcome
returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₦3.567 per ₦1 investede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TME 419 planted sole had the highest return of ₦3.567 per ₦1 invested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2924–2993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TME 419 returned ₦3.416 per ₦1 invested.

Material
TME 419e0
Outcome
returne0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
₦3.416 per ₦1 investede0
Comparator
other intercropped treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TME 419 intercropped at the same time gave a return of ₦3.416 per ₦1 invested, which was greater than other intercropped treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2995–3126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava to time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend simultaneous plantain and TME 419 cassava planting in the study area.

Material
TME 419e0
Outcome
This combination are recommendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping cassava with plantain at the same time, as well as the use of TME 419 variety gave the best performance in terms of growth, yield, land equivalent ratio, area time equivalent ratio and returns on investment. This combination are recommended for plantain-based intercropping system involving cassava in the study area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3128–3459 · show in text ↑

Musa ABB Group · yield · Musa x paradisiaca (banana)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

intercropping · growth · Musa x paradisiaca (banana)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.