Paper · 2019 · Semina Ciências Agrárias

Field corn yield in response to humic acids application in the absence or presence of liming and mineral fertilization

Marihus Altoé Baldotto; Raphael Oliveira de Melo; Lilían Borges Baldotto

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Corn cultivation continually demands new technologies, since average yields can still be increased. This study aimed to evaluate the response of high-yield corn to humic acids, isolated from organic manure compost, with or without the application of lime and fertilizer. The experiment was conducted at Milhão® (http://www.omilhao.com.br) in Florestal, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Three treatments were used: (a) control, without liming, fertilization, or humic acids; (b) conventional farm cultivation, with liming and fertilization; (c) liming, fertilization, and humic acids applied to seeds. The experiment design was a randomized block with five replicates (fifteen experimental units). Lime was applied at 1.6 Mg ha-1, incorporated into total area. Fertilization treatments included 300 kg ha-1 NPK 08-28-16 at sowing, and 500 kg ha-1 NPK 20-00-20 in coverage. The concentration of humic acids used in both seed treatment was 10 mmol L-1 of C. Biometrics and biomass productivity were evaluated at harvest time. Humic acids, whether applied as a seed coating, increased yield by ~15% higher than conventional farm cultivation, and this difference was statistically significant. Therefore, the use of humic acids based plant regulators is positive and complementary to the inputs generally used for corn yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid seed coating increased corn yield by about 15% over conventional cultivation.

Treatment
Humic acids, whether applied as a seed coatinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
~15%e0
Comparator
conventional farm cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acids, whether applied as a seed coating, increased yield by ~15% higher than conventional farm cultivation, and this difference was statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–10 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend humic acid plant regulators as a complement to corn inputs.

Outcome
use of humic acids based plant regulatorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of humic acids based plant regulators is positive and complementary to the inputs generally used for corn yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1315 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 150 positive, 15 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 221 positive, 32 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.