Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Humic acid seed coating increased corn yield by about 15% over conventional cultivation.

A claim from Field corn yield in response to humic acids application in the absence or presence of liming and mineral fertilization · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid seed coating increased corn yield by about 15% over conventional cultivation.

Treatment
Humic acids, whether applied as a seed coatinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
~15%e0
Comparator
conventional farm cultivatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acids, whether applied as a seed coating, increased yield by ~15% higher than conventional farm cultivation, and this difference was statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1183
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–10

Title

Field corn yield in response to humic acids application in the absence or presence of liming and mineral fertilization

Marihus Altoé Baldotto; Raphael Oliveira de Melo; Lilían Borges Baldotto Semina Ciências Agrárias 2019. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6supl2p3299

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-efcb071ea67d1739c6be916af1c60fd4812e330a86e95d9d0991f3bde6c23ce1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 150 positive, 15 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

156 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 221 positive, 32 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this claim · 26 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

244 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.