Paper · 2021 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Humic acid and nitrogen dose application in corn crop under alkaline soil conditions

Kamran Azeem; Farah Naz; Arshad Jalal; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Humic acid (HA), as a bio-stimulant and a major component of organic matter (OM), can improve plant physiology, soil fertility, and nutrient availability, mainly in low OM soils. Nitrogen (N) is one of the most important nutrients that affect several metabolic and biochemical activities, leading to improved plant development. This study was conducted to investigate the combined effect of HA and N doses on soil organic matter (SOM) and total N concentration, N uptake, corn growth, and grain yield under conventional tillage at Peshawar, Pakistan. Treatments were tested in a randomized block design with four replicates arranged in a factorial scheme 3 × 4 + 1. The respective doses of HA (1.5, 3,0 and 4.5 kg ha-1) were applied at the corn sowing, whereas N doses (80, 120, 160, and 200 kg ha-1) were applied in three splits (1/3 at sowing, 1/3 at the V5 stage, and remaining 1/3 at the tasselling stage) with one control (no HA and N). The application of HA, regardless of the applied doses, had positive effects on SOM, N concentration, N uptake, corn development, and grain yield. However, the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HA was the most effective in promoting SOM (0.83%) and total N (0.31%), shoot biomass (10610 kg ha-1), N uptake (1.13%), and grain yield (3780 kg ha-1), even when combined with the N doses of 80, 120 and 160 kg N ha-1. Increasing N doses positively influenced SOM, N concentration, N uptake, and corn growth. The greatest grain yield was obtained at 150 kg ha-1 of N regardless of HA applied doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid application had positive effects on soil organic matter, N concentration and N uptake of corn compared with the control without HA and N.

Treatment
The application of HAe1
Outcome
SOM, N concentration, N uptakee1
Direction
positive effectse1
Comparator
control (no HA and N)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of HA, regardless of the applied doses, had positive effects on SOM, N concentration, N uptake, corn development, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1096 · show in text ↑
e2

“with one control (no HA and N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid application had positive effects on corn development and grain yield compared with the control without HA and N.

Treatment
The application of HAe1
Outcome
corn development, and grain yielde1
Direction
positive effectse1
Comparator
control (no HA and N)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of HA, regardless of the applied doses, had positive effects on SOM, N concentration, N uptake, corn development, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1096 · show in text ↑
e2

“with one control (no HA and N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N doses positively influenced soil organic matter, N concentration and N uptake of corn.

Treatment
Increasing N dosese3
Outcome
SOM, N concentration, N uptakee3
Direction
positively influencede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increasing N doses positively influenced SOM, N concentration, N uptake, and corn growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N doses positively influenced corn growth.

Treatment
Increasing N dosese3
Outcome
corn growthe3
Direction
positively influencede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increasing N doses positively influenced SOM, N concentration, N uptake, and corn growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

4.5 kg ha-1 of HA was the most effective dose for promoting soil organic matter, reaching 0.83%.

Treatment
the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HAe4
Outcome
SOMe4
Direction
promotinge4
Value
0.83%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HA was the most effective in promoting SOM (0.83%) and total N (0.31%), shoot biomass (10610 kg ha-1), N uptake (1.13%), and grain yield (3780 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

4.5 kg ha-1 of HA was the most effective dose for promoting total N, reaching 0.31%.

Treatment
the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HAe4
Outcome
total Ne4
Direction
promotinge4
Value
0.31%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HA was the most effective in promoting SOM (0.83%) and total N (0.31%), shoot biomass (10610 kg ha-1), N uptake (1.13%), and grain yield (3780 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 4.5 kg ha-1 of HA, corn shoot biomass was 10610 kg ha-1.

Treatment
the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HAe4
Outcome
shoot biomasse4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
10610 kg ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HA was the most effective in promoting SOM (0.83%) and total N (0.31%), shoot biomass (10610 kg ha-1), N uptake (1.13%), and grain yield (3780 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 4.5 kg ha-1 of HA, corn N uptake was 1.13%.

Treatment
the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HAe4
Outcome
N uptakee4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
1.13%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HA was the most effective in promoting SOM (0.83%) and total N (0.31%), shoot biomass (10610 kg ha-1), N uptake (1.13%), and grain yield (3780 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 4.5 kg ha-1 of HA, corn grain yield was 3780 kg ha-1.

Treatment
the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HAe4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
3780 kg ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“the application of 4.5 kg ha-1 of HA was the most effective in promoting SOM (0.83%) and total N (0.31%), shoot biomass (10610 kg ha-1), N uptake (1.13%), and grain yield (3780 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest corn grain yield was obtained at 150 kg ha-1 of N regardless of HA dose.

Treatment
150 kg ha-1 of Ne5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
greateste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e5

“The greatest grain yield was obtained at 150 kg ha-1 of N regardless of HA applied doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1538 · show in text ↑

other · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 40 positive, 9 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 107 positive, 12 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

other · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 164 positive, 20 negative or no effect

163 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 221 positive, 32 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.