Paper · 2019 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Economics of botanicals and biopesticides especially in reference to management of Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea crop

Anil Kumar; MK Tripathi; Umesh Chandra; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was carried out at the Agriculture Farm, Department of Entomology, Tilak Dhari Post Graduate College, Jaunpur during Rabi 2010-11 and 2011-12 with three replications and seven treatments of Biopesticides, against Helicoverpa armigera. The Biopesticides like NSKE, Bacillus thuringiensis, Neem leaf extract, Neem oil, Nimbicidine and nuclear polyhedrosis virus in reducing the infestation of gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera and providing a higher net return per rupee invested. The higher grain yield of 24.07 Q./ha and22.65 Q/ha was recorded with the application of NSKE @ 5 per cent /ha during both years. The most favourable cost benefit ratio was obtained from the plot treated with Neem leaf Extract @ 5 per cent 31.82 and 22.22 followed by Neem leaf Extract @ 5 per cent 31.82 and 22.22, Neem oil @ 2 per cent 22.59 and 20.94, NSKE @ 5 per cent 19.68 and 15.06, Nimbecidine @ 2 per cent 16.16 and 15.04, Ha NPV @ 450 LE/ ha 9.34 and 6.28, Bt.1 kg /ha 6.40 and 4.91 during both years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed biopesticides reduced gram pod borer infestation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Biopesticidese0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
infestation of gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigerae0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Biopesticides like NSKE, Bacillus thuringiensis, Neem leaf extract, Neem oil, Nimbicidine and nuclear polyhedrosis virus in reducing the infestation of gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed biopesticides provided higher net return per rupee invested.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Biopesticidese1
Outcome
net return per rupee investede0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“providing a higher net return per rupee invested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Biopesticides like NSKE, Bacillus thuringiensis, Neem leaf extract, Neem oil, Nimbicidine and nuclear polyhedrosis virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE at 5 per cent produced grain yields of 24.07 and 22.65 Q/ha in the two years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NSKE @ 5 per cent /hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
24.07 Q./ha and22.65 Q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher grain yield of 24.07 Q./ha and22.65 Q/ha was recorded with the application of NSKE @ 5 per cent /ha during both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract at 5 per cent gave the most favourable cost benefit ratios, 31.82 and 22.22.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Neem leaf Extract @ 5 per cente0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
most favourablee0
Value
31.82 and 22.22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most favourable cost benefit ratio was obtained from the plot treated with Neem leaf Extract @ 5 per cent 31.82 and 22.22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil at 2 per cent had cost benefit ratios of 22.59 and 20.94.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Neem oil @ 2 per cente0
Outcome
Neem oil @ 2 per cente0
Value
22.59 and 20.94e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem oil @ 2 per cent 22.59 and 20.94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE at 5 per cent had cost benefit ratios of 19.68 and 15.06.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NSKE @ 5 per cente0
Outcome
NSKE @ 5 per cente0
Value
19.68 and 15.06e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NSKE @ 5 per cent 19.68 and 15.06”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nimbecidine at 2 per cent had cost benefit ratios of 16.16 and 15.04.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Nimbecidine @ 2 per cente0
Outcome
Nimbecidine @ 2 per cente0
Value
16.16 and 15.04e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nimbecidine @ 2 per cent 16.16 and 15.04”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ha NPV at 450 LE/ha had cost benefit ratios of 9.34 and 6.28.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Ha NPV @ 450 LE/ hae0
Outcome
Ha NPV @ 450 LE/ hae0
Value
9.34 and 6.28e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ha NPV @ 450 LE/ ha 9.34 and 6.28”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt at 1 kg/ha had cost benefit ratios of 6.40 and 4.91.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Bt.1 kg /hae0
Outcome
Bt.1 kg /hae0
Value
6.40 and 4.91e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bt.1 kg /ha 6.40 and 4.91”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–120 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

botanical · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

biocontrol · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.