Paper · 2019 · JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

The Induction of High-Frequency Callus with an Elite Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) from Côte d'Ivoire

Affoué Sylvie Rachelle N'GUESSAN; Koutouan AYOLIE; Sopie Edwige Salomé YAPO; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In cotton, factors such as carbon sources, hormonal combination, and type of explant influence the responses to callus induction. In this study callus induction was optimized to get high-frequency callus in cotton. Different carbon sources were tested, and among them, glucose at 3% was found to be the best carbohydrate in callus induction. Culture medium supplemented with 2,4-D (0.1 mg.L-1) and KIN (0.5 mg.L-1) gave a high callogenesis response, unlike other hormonal combinations. With explants, hypocotyl (72.93%) appeared easier to induce callus than cotyledon (48.75%) following root (37.5%). So, carbone sources, hormone, and their concentration affect significantly callus induction. The highest frequency of callus induction was then observed when hypocotyl explants were cultured on medium supplemented with 0.1 mg.L-1 of 2,4-D in combination with 0.5 mg.L-1 of KIN and 3% glucose. The induced-callus obtained were friable and of high quality. The other types of combinations resulted in the formation of compact callus with sometimes roots emerging from it. The present study may provide an efficient protocol to improve the callogenesis responses by adjusting the carbohydrates, the hormonal regime, and the type of explant to be cultured for a high-frequency callus induction of the Y331B-R5 cotton cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose at 3% was the best carbohydrate for cotton callus induction.

Treatment
glucose at 3%e0
Outcome
callus inductione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glucose at 3% was found to be the best carbohydrate in callus induction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium with 2,4-D and KIN gave high callogenesis relative to other hormone combinations.

Treatment
2,4-D (0.1 mg.L-1) and KIN (0.5 mg.L-1)e0
Outcome
callogenesis responsee0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
other hormonal combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Culture medium supplemented with 2,4-D (0.1 mg.L-1) and KIN (0.5 mg.L-1) gave a high callogenesis response, unlike other hormonal combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypocotyl explants had 72.93% callus induction, above cotyledon and root explants.

Organ / stage
hypocotyle0
Treatment
hypocotyle0
Outcome
induce calluse0
Direction
easiere0
Value
72.93%e0
Comparator
cotyledone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hypocotyl (72.93%) appeared easier to induce callus than cotyledon (48.75%) following root (37.5%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotyledon explants had 48.75% callus induction.

Organ / stage
cotyledone0
Outcome
cotyledone0
Value
48.75%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotyledon (48.75%) following root (37.5%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root explants had 37.5% callus induction.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
roote0
Value
37.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root (37.5%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined hypocotyl, 2,4-D, KIN and glucose treatment gave the highest callus induction frequency.

Organ / stage
hypocotyle0
Treatment
0.1 mg.L-1 of 2,4-D in combination with 0.5 mg.L-1 of KIN and 3% glucosee0
Outcome
frequency of callus inductione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest frequency of callus induction was then observed when hypocotyl explants were cultured on medium supplemented with 0.1 mg.L-1 of 2,4-D in combination with 0.5 mg.L-1 of KIN and 3% glucose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The induced callus was friable and high quality.

Outcome
friable and of high qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The induced-callus obtained were friable and of high quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other treatment combinations formed compact callus, sometimes with roots.

Outcome
formation of compact callus with sometimes roots emerging from ite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The other types of combinations resulted in the formation of compact callus with sometimes roots emerging from it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

glucose · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.