Paper · 2019 · Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Interaction between Biotic and Abiotic Agents to Control of Potato Bacterial Wilt Disease

Hanan Abdrabouh; Afaf Zein El-abdeen; Nagy Abdel-Ghafar

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi, et al. (1995) is one of the most important bacterial diseases over the world. This study was planned to control the disease using interaction between biotic and abiotic agents, under greenhouse experiment. In vitro, tested bactericides (gentamycin, ceflaxcin and copper sulphate) were decreased growth of R. solanacerum compared with control treatment. Copper sulphate was the most effective compared with ceflaxcin and gentamycin, but ceflaxcin was moderately effective and gentamycin was less effective against the pathogen. Inhibition zone diameter was increased with increasing concentrations of tested bactericides. Application of different bio-agent isolates (Pseudomonas fluorescence, Bacillus subtitlis, Bacillus megaterium and Serratia mareacescne) were reduced the growth of the pathogen compared with control treatment. B. subtilis isolate was the most effective, but isolates of Ps. fluorescens and B. megaterium were moderately effective and S. marescences isolate was less effective against the pathogen. Greenhouse experiments, disease severity were decreased and potato yield were increased with interaction between bio-agents (Bacillus subtilis, and Pseudomonas fluorescence isolates) and bactericides (gentamycin and ceflaxcin), or bio-agents and resistance inducers factors (salicylic acid and jasmonic acid) or bactericides and resistance inducers factors compared with control treatment. However, interaction between bio-agents as tuber treatment and bactericides as soil drench treatment or interactions between bactericides as soil drench treatment and resistance inducers as foliar treatment were the most effective against the disease and the yield. But, interactions between bio-agents as soil drench treatment and resistance inducers as foliar treatment were moderately effective to control the disease and the yield. But, interaction between ceflaxcin as bactericide and Ps. fluorescens isolate as bio-agent or salicylic acid as resistance inducer were the most effective on disease severity and the yield compared with other treatments, but interaction between B. subtilis isolate as bio-agent and jasmonic acid as resistance inducer were less effective compared with other treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested bactericides decreased Ralstonia growth in vitro versus control.

Treatment
tested bactericidese0
Interactor
R. solanacerume0pathogen
Outcome
growth of R. solanacerume0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“tested bactericides (gentamycin, ceflaxcin and copper sulphate) were decreased growth of R. solanacerum compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–425 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper sulphate was most effective against the pathogen in vitro.

Treatment
Copper sulphatee0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
ceflaxcin and gentamycine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Copper sulphate was the most effective compared with ceflaxcin and gentamycin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibition zone diameter rose with bactericide concentration.

Treatment
tested bactericidese0
Outcome
Inhibition zone diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inhibition zone diameter was increased with increasing concentrations of tested bactericides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioagent isolates reduced pathogen growth versus control.

Treatment
different bio-agent isolatese0
Outcome
growth of the pathogene0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of different bio-agent isolates (Pseudomonas fluorescence, Bacillus subtitlis, Bacillus megaterium and Serratia mareacescne) were reduced the growth of the pathogen compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–903 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis isolate was the most effective bioagent.

Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“B. subtilis isolate was the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined agents decreased potato disease severity versus control.

Treatment
interaction between bio-agentse0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“disease severity were decreased and potato yield were increased with interaction between bio-agents (Bacillus subtilis, and Pseudomonas fluorescence isolates) and bactericides (gentamycin and ceflaxcin), or bio-agents and resistance inducers factors (salicylic acid and jasmonic acid) or bactericides and resistance inducers factors compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined agents increased potato yield versus control.

Treatment
interaction between bio-agentse0
Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“disease severity were decreased and potato yield were increased with interaction between bio-agents (Bacillus subtilis, and Pseudomonas fluorescence isolates) and bactericides (gentamycin and ceflaxcin), or bio-agents and resistance inducers factors (salicylic acid and jasmonic acid) or bactericides and resistance inducers factors compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber bioagents with soil-drench bactericides were among the most effective combinations against disease and yield.

Outcome
most effective against the disease and the yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction between bio-agents as tuber treatment and bactericides as soil drench treatment or interactions between bactericides as soil drench treatment and resistance inducers as foliar treatment were the most effective against the disease and the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioagent soil drench with inducer foliar treatment was moderately effective.

Outcome
moderately effective to control the disease and the yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“interactions between bio-agents as soil drench treatment and resistance inducers as foliar treatment were moderately effective to control the disease and the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1917 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ceflaxcin with Ps. fluorescens or salicylic acid was most effective on disease severity and yield.

Outcome
most effective on disease severity and the yielde0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction between ceflaxcin as bactericide and Ps. fluorescens isolate as bio-agent or salicylic acid as resistance inducer were the most effective on disease severity and the yield compared with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–2138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis with jasmonic acid was less effective than other treatments.

Outcome
less effectivee0
Comparator
other treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction between B. subtilis isolate as bio-agent and jasmonic acid as resistance inducer were less effective compared with other treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2144–2286 · show in text ↑

insecticide · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.