Intervention effectmodel-written summary

BCA treatments with half fertilizer did not differ significantly from the fully fertilized control in tuber number and weight.

A claim from Control of bacterial wilt (ralstoniasolanacearum) in potato (Solanum tuberosum) using rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi. · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BCA treatments with half fertilizer did not differ significantly from the fully fertilized control in tuber number and weight.

Treatment
BCA treatments with half fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
tuber number and weighte0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
complete fertilized controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference (P0.05) in tuber number and weight in the BCA treatments with half fertilizer application and complete fertilized control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1705
t0

“potato (Solanum tuberosum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79
t1

“potato (Solanum tuberosum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–341

Title

Control of bacterial wilt (ralstoniasolanacearum) in potato (Solanum tuberosum) using rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi.

Joyce Aguk; N Karanja; E Schulte - Geldermann; et al. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development 2018. doi:10.18697/ajfand.82.16905

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-3fa5ff305286e34c0135cde4966930291c1b0cbb1c87592e6cfd08a589d165e5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

biocontrol · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this claim · 394 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

441 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.