Paper · 2023 · Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)

Rhizoctonia potato disease in production conditions in the forest-steppe of Western Siberia

U. V. Pilipova; E. M. Shaldyaeva

15
claims
42
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The authors carried out a scientific study from 1990 to 2022 on 20 varieties of potatoes to study the pathogenesis of Rhizoctonia in crop production conditions and substantiate the methods of the system of protection against the disease. The fungus R. Solani persists annually in the soil and on seed tubers in the form of mycelium and sclerotia. It was found that more than 60% of the grounds of potato agroecosystems have the content of the causative agent of Rhizoctonia is many times higher than the established ETH (Economic threshold of harmfulness). Furthermore, monitoring of the phytosanitary state of potato seed material showed that, on average, about 60% of the tubers are inhabited by the causative agent of Rhizoctonia, including about 30% of the sclerotial form, which is six times higher than the phytosanitary regulations. Thus, in the region’s conditions, a double mechanism of phytopathogen transmission is provided annually. The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts, subsequently causing their complete death (on average 12%) and shootouts, reducing the density of productive plants in crop plantings. At subsequent stages of growth and development of potatoes, significant expansion of the disease on the stems was noted (on average 31.4%), and stolons were damaged and died (9.3 and 5.5%, respectively), which disrupted the processes of stolon and tuberization. In the region’s conditions, Rhizoctonia occurs in the form of epiphytotic with a prevalence of 88% or more. Therefore, the potato protection strategy against Rhizoctonia should be based on methods that reduce the initial population density of the R. Solani fungus in the soils of agroecosystems and on seed tubers. Essential elements of potato cultivation technology are cropping rotation with a saturation of no more than 30% (biological efficiency - 43.2–79.5%); phytosanitary precursor, including green manure pairs (biological efficiency - 49.0–75.9%); mandatory etching with chemical preparations (biological efficiency - 54.9–98.8%) or natural origin. Using entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium robertsii and Baeuveria bassiana can be a promising direction in reducing Rhizoctonia. Dressing seed tubers with conidia of entomopathogenic fungi suppressed the development of the disease in potato plantings by 1.8–3.7%, providing an increase in yield by 12.1–19.2%. The study of the influence of Metarhizium robertsii and Baeuveria bassiana on the pathogenesis of Rhizoctonia will be continued.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. Solani persists annually in soil and potato seed tubers as mycelium and sclerotia.

Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
persists annually in the soil and on seed tubers in the form of mycelium and sclerotiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungus R. Solani persists annually in the soil and on seed tubers in the form of mycelium and sclerotia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than 60% of potato agroecosystem grounds had Rhizoctonia agent content above the economic threshold.

Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
content of the causative agent of Rhizoctoniae0
Direction
highere0
Value
more than 60%e0
Comparator
established ETH (Economic threshold of harmfulness)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more than 60% of the grounds of potato agroecosystems have the content of the causative agent of Rhizoctonia is many times higher than the established ETH (Economic threshold of harmfulness)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 60% of potato tubers carried the Rhizoctonia agent.

Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
tubers are inhabited by the causative agent of Rhizoctoniae0
Value
about 60%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“about 60% of the tubers are inhabited by the causative agent of Rhizoctonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 30% of potato tubers carried the sclerotial form, six times the phytosanitary regulation.

Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
sclerotial forme0
Direction
highere0
Value
about 30%e0
Qualifier
six times highere0
Comparator
phytosanitary regulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“including about 30% of the sclerotial form, which is six times higher than the phytosanitary regulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia caused death of an average 12% of potato sprouts.

Organ / stage
sproutse2
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
complete deathe0
Value
on average 12%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“causing their complete death (on average 12%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
e2

“potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia reduced potato productive plant density.

Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
density of productive plantse0
Direction
reducinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing the density of productive plants in crop plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia disease expanded on potato stems, averaging 31.4%.

Organ / stage
stemse0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
disease on the stemse0
Direction
expansione0
Value
on average 31.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant expansion of the disease on the stems was noted (on average 31.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato stolons were damaged at 9.3%.

Organ / stage
stolonse0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
stolons were damagede0
Value
9.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stolons were damaged and died (9.3 and 5.5%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato stolon mortality was 5.5%.

Organ / stage
stolonse0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
stolons were damaged and diede0
Value
5.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stolons were damaged and died (9.3 and 5.5%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia occurred epiphytotically with prevalence of at least 88%.

Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
Rhizoctonia occurs in the form of epiphytotice0
Value
88% or moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizoctonia occurs in the form of epiphytotic with a prevalence of 88% or more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cropping rotation with a saturation of no more than 30% had biological efficiency 43.2–79.5%.

Treatment
cropping rotation with a saturation of no more than 30%e0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
biological efficiencye0
Value
43.2–79.5%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cropping rotation with a saturation of no more than 30% (biological efficiency - 43.2–79.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1864 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

phytosanitary precursor, including green manure pairs had biological efficiency 49.0–75.9%.

Treatment
phytosanitary precursor, including green manure pairse0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
biological efficiencye0
Value
49.0–75.9%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phytosanitary precursor, including green manure pairs (biological efficiency - 49.0–75.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

etching with chemical preparations had biological efficiency 54.9–98.8%.

Treatment
etching with chemical preparationse0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
biological efficiencye0
Value
54.9–98.8%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mandatory etching with chemical preparations (biological efficiency - 54.9–98.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1958–2039 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed tuber dressing with entomopathogenic fungal conidia suppressed Rhizoctonia development by 1.8–3.7%.

Treatment
Dressing seed tubers with conidia of entomopathogenic fungie0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae1pathogen
Outcome
development of the diseasee0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
1.8–3.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dressing seed tubers with conidia of entomopathogenic fungi suppressed the development of the disease in potato plantings by 1.8–3.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2320 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The causative agent of Rhizoctonia infects potato sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed tuber dressing with entomopathogenic fungal conidia increased potato yield by 12.1–19.2%.

Treatment
Dressing seed tubers with conidia of entomopathogenic fungie1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12.1–19.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“providing an increase in yield by 12.1–19.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2322–2366 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dressing seed tubers with conidia of entomopathogenic fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2246 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · Rhizoctonia · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · Rhizoctonia · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · Rhizoctonia · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.