Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Efficacy of pinching and plant growth regulators in enhancing yield characters of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

Nayak Nayak; VK Parmar; Patel An; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cucumber is a portentous cucurbitaceous vegetable, valued for its nutritive cum medicinal properties. Its production potential relies upon numerous factors, and can easily be augmented by manipulating them, therefore a field experiment was conducted with the objective of evaluating the effect of pinching and PGRs on yield characters of cucumber cv. Gujarat Cucumber-1 using various pinching and PGRs treatments. The experiment was arranged over 15 treatment combinations comprising of 3 levels of pinching (P0: no pinching, P1: pinching at 4th node and P2: pinching at 6th node) and 5 levels of PGRs (G0: control, G1: CCC @ 200 ppm, G2: CCC @ 400 ppm, G3: ethrel @ 300 ppm and G4: ethrel @ 600 ppm) laid out in a Randomized Block Design (Factorial concept) with three replications. The pinching treatment and the PGRs application individually significantly influenced the yield parameters such as the average length of fruit, number of fruits per vine, yield per vine and yield per hectare, but both failed to manifest any evident effect on the average fruit weight. Pinching at 6th node and higher doses of both ethrel and CCC had significantly enhanced most of the yield characters. The interaction effect of pinching and PGRs failed to exhibit any significant effect for all the characters studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching significantly influenced average fruit length and number of fruits per vine in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pinching treatmente0
Outcome
average length of fruit, number of fruits per vinee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pinching treatment and the PGRs application individually significantly influenced the yield parameters such as the average length of fruit, number of fruits per vine, yield per vine and yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching significantly influenced yield per vine and yield per hectare in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pinching treatmente0
Outcome
yield per vine and yield per hectaree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pinching treatment and the PGRs application individually significantly influenced the yield parameters such as the average length of fruit, number of fruits per vine, yield per vine and yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR application significantly influenced average fruit length and number of fruits per vine in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
PGRs applicatione0
Outcome
average length of fruit, number of fruits per vinee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pinching treatment and the PGRs application individually significantly influenced the yield parameters such as the average length of fruit, number of fruits per vine, yield per vine and yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR application significantly influenced yield per vine and yield per hectare in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
PGRs applicatione0
Outcome
yield per vine and yield per hectaree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pinching treatment and the PGRs application individually significantly influenced the yield parameters such as the average length of fruit, number of fruits per vine, yield per vine and yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching had no evident effect on average fruit weight of cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pinching treatmente0
Outcome
average fruit weighte1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pinching treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–806 · show in text ↑
e1

“both failed to manifest any evident effect on the average fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR application had no evident effect on average fruit weight of cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
PGRs applicatione0
Outcome
average fruit weighte1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the PGRs application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“both failed to manifest any evident effect on the average fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching at the 6th node significantly enhanced most yield characters of cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Pinching at 6th nodee0
Outcome
most of the yield characterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinching at 6th node and higher doses of both ethrel and CCC had significantly enhanced most of the yield characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher doses of ethrel significantly enhanced most yield characters of cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
higher doses of both ethrele0
Outcome
most of the yield characterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinching at 6th node and higher doses of both ethrel and CCC had significantly enhanced most of the yield characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher doses of CCC significantly enhanced most yield characters of cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
most of the yield characterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinching at 6th node and higher doses of both ethrel and CCC had significantly enhanced most of the yield characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of pinching and PGRs had no significant effect on any of the characters studied in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
interaction effect of pinching and PGRse0
Outcome
all the characters studiede0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effect of pinching and PGRs failed to exhibit any significant effect for all the characters studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

chlormequat chloride · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

class · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.