Paper · 2026 · Scientia Horticulturae

Remove it to improve it? The impact of young-leaf pruning on high-wire cucumber production

Julia Winkeler; Ep Heuvelink; Leo F.M. Marcelis

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In high-wire tomato, pruning young leaves at the top of the canopy is common practice to increase yield. While pruning young leaves increases dry matter partitioning to the fruits, it also leads to decreased leaf area index (LAI), which could counteract this benefit. This research investigated the impact of young-leaf pruning on the yield of a high-wire cucumber crop. Moderate pruning was hypothesized to slightly increase yield over the non-pruned canopy due to increased dry matter partitioning to the fruits. In contrast, heavy pruning was expected to decrease yield attributed to a reduction in LAI. In a greenhouse experiment, 0%, 33%, and 50% of leaves were removed at an early leaf development stage and a yield component analysis was conducted. Young-leaf pruning led to a lower cumulative fruit yield. Unexpectedly, the 33% and 50% pruning treatments had similar yields. Dry matter partitioning to the fruits did not increase with pruning. An assimilate partitioning model, based on organ sink strengths, illustrated that the observed increase in fruit abortion and fruit growth duration reduced the impact of young-leaf pruning on dry matter partitioning mainly for the 33% treatment. LAI reduced from 3.1 to 2.3 to 1.9 for the 0%, 33%, and 50% treatments, respectively. Reductions in LAI and light interception due to young-leaf pruning resulted in reduced yield. Therefore, young-leaf pruning in a high-wire cucumber greenhouse, using similar cultivation parameters, is not recommended for the purpose of increasing yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young-leaf pruning lowered cumulative fruit yield.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Young-leaf pruninge0
Outcome
cumulative fruit yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Young-leaf pruning led to a lower cumulative fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 33% and 50% pruning treatments produced similar yields.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
33%e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
50% pruning treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 33% and 50% pruning treatments had similar yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning did not increase fruit dry-matter partitioning.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
Dry matter partitioning to the fruitse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter partitioning to the fruits did not increase with pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The assimilate model indicated that greater fruit abortion reduced the pruning effect on partitioning, mainly at 33% pruning.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
young-leaf pruninge0
Outcome
dry matter partitioninge0
Qualifier
increase in fruit abortione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“observed increase in fruit abortion and fruit growth duration reduced the impact of young-leaf pruning on dry matter partitioning mainly for the 33% treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The assimilate model indicated that longer fruit growth duration reduced the pruning effect on partitioning, mainly at 33% pruning.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
young-leaf pruninge0
Outcome
dry matter partitioninge0
Qualifier
fruit growth duratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“observed increase in fruit abortion and fruit growth duration reduced the impact of young-leaf pruning on dry matter partitioning mainly for the 33% treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index fell from 3.1 without pruning to 2.3 with 33% pruning.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
33%e0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.3e0
Comparator
0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAI reduced from 3.1 to 2.3 to 1.9 for the 0%, 33%, and 50% treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index fell from 3.1 without pruning to 1.9 with 50% pruning.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
50%e0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.9e0
Comparator
0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAI reduced from 3.1 to 2.3 to 1.9 for the 0%, 33%, and 50% treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning reduced light interception.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
young-leaf pruninge0
Outcome
light interceptione0
Direction
Reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in LAI and light interception due to young-leaf pruning resulted in reduced yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors do not recommend pruning young leaves to increase greenhouse cucumber yield under similar conditions.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
young-leaf pruning in a high-wire cucumber greenhouse, using similar cultivation parameters, is not recommendede0
Qualifier
for the purpose of increasing yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“young-leaf pruning in a high-wire cucumber greenhouse, using similar cultivation parameters, is not recommended for the purpose of increasing yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

pruning · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.