pruning · Yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)
25 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 16
Effect of Embryonic-root cutting on drought-resistance and fruit yield of cucumber · 2004
- positive
Effect of substrate mating and pruning methods on fruit type cucumber growth and quality · 2009
- positive
- positive
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PLANTING CUCUMBER HYBRIDS BY USING CUTTINGS AND CONVENTIONAL METHOD · 2012
- positive
- positive
Phytohormones Content in Cucumber Leaves by Using Pruning as a Mechanical Stress · 2013
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of mulching materials and pruning on growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) · 2017
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
Response of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) to differential pruning under greenhouse · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Root characteristics on different training methods of cucumber production in hydroponic system · 2024
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Optimizing land resources through vegetable crop production (Cucumber and Beans) on cocoa farms · 2025
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.