Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of GA3 and NAA with pruning levels on growth, sex expression and yield attributes of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Malini F1) under protected condition

Baqi Abdul; R. K. Manohar; Shankar Ag

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Evidence had accumulated from a number of experiments indicating that plant growth regulators levels may modify the sex expression of flowering plants. The effect of foliar application of GA3 (25 ppm and 50 ppm), NAA (500 ppm and 1000 ppm) and pruning (no pruning and double stem pruning) on growth, flowering, yield and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus hyb. Malini F1) were studied at Precision Farming Development Center (PFDC), Department of Horticulture, University of Agricultural Sciences GKVK, Bangalore during (2017-18) under protected condition. The plant growth regulators were applied on 4 true leaf stages. The results of the study revealed that, combined application of GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruning had more significant effects on vegetative growth, increased the flowering, suppressed the staminate flowers and enhanced the pistillate flowers, so that the fruit yield was more higher per plant and per hectare than control and other treatment combinations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 and NAA at 50 ppm plus 500 ppm with double stem pruning increased cucumber vegetative growth versus controls and other combinations.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruninge0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
more significant effectse0
Comparator
control and other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruning had more significant effects on vegetative growth, increased the flowering, suppressed the staminate flowers and enhanced the pistillate flowers, so that the fruit yield was more higher per plant and per hectare than control and other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Malini F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased cucumber flowering relative to controls and other combinations.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruninge0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruning had more significant effects on vegetative growth, increased the flowering, suppressed the staminate flowers and enhanced the pistillate flowers, so that the fruit yield was more higher per plant and per hectare than control and other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Malini F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment suppressed staminate flowers in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruninge0
Outcome
staminate flowerse0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
control and other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruning had more significant effects on vegetative growth, increased the flowering, suppressed the staminate flowers and enhanced the pistillate flowers, so that the fruit yield was more higher per plant and per hectare than control and other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Malini F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment enhanced pistillate flowers in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruninge0
Outcome
pistillate flowerse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control and other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruning had more significant effects on vegetative growth, increased the flowering, suppressed the staminate flowers and enhanced the pistillate flowers, so that the fruit yield was more higher per plant and per hectare than control and other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Malini F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised cucumber fruit yield per plant relative to controls and other combinations.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruninge0
Outcome
fruit yield was more higher per plante0
Direction
more highere0
Comparator
control and other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruning had more significant effects on vegetative growth, increased the flowering, suppressed the staminate flowers and enhanced the pistillate flowers, so that the fruit yield was more higher per plant and per hectare than control and other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Malini F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised cucumber fruit yield per hectare relative to controls and other combinations.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruninge0
Outcome
per hectaree0
Direction
more highere0
Comparator
control and other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of GA3 and NAA (50 ppm + 500 ppm) with double stem pruning had more significant effects on vegetative growth, increased the flowering, suppressed the staminate flowers and enhanced the pistillate flowers, so that the fruit yield was more higher per plant and per hectare than control and other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Malini F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Gibberellic acid · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

pruning · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pruning · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.