Paper · 2024 · Plant Root

Root characteristics on different training methods of cucumber production in hydroponic system

Nethone Samba; Satoru Tsukagoshi; Akimasa Nakano

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The influence of training methods on the yields of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) was investigated in the aspects of root characteristics. The experiment was conducted in the new Nutrient Film Technique hydroponics system specially developed for cucumber production (Mitsubishi Chemical Aqua Solutions, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).The lowering training (LT) and the pinching training (PT) were used to manage the cucumber plant’s canopy during the growth cycle. At the end of the experiment, the xylem sap bleeding rate, the root biomass, the remaining aerial biomass and the main stem diameter were measured. In addition, individual fresh and dry weights of matured leaves at the lower, middle and upper parts of the plant’s canopy were measured during the growth period. The recorded fruits yield was used for a correlation test with the xylem sap bleeding rate. The results indicated that the sap bleeding rate, root dry weight and root dry and fresh weights ratio were significantly higher in LT treatment. Similarly, the remaining aerial biomass fresh weight was significantly greater in the same treatment. On the other hand, individual leaf fresh and dry weights and the main stem diameter were significantly greater in the PT treatment, at the middle and upper parts of the plant’s canopy. These results were explained by the fact that in the PT treatment, more carbohydrates produced by plants were apparently used to re-establish the pinched shoots at the expense of root production. Moreover, after pinching the lateral shoots, biomass production was improved due to the penetration of sunlight in the plant’s canopy. Considering the relationships between root traits and plant productivity, the LT method is suitable for a long-term cultivation due to its faster sap bleeding rate, which is necessary to stimulate root physiological activity and promote plant biomass production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowering training (LT) gave higher xylem sap bleeding rate, root dry weight and root dry and fresh weights ratio than pinching training (PT) in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
lowering training (LT)e0
Outcome
sap bleeding rate, root dry weight and root dry and fresh weights ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
pinching training (PT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowering training (LT) and the pinching training (PT) were used to manage the cucumber plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–420 · show in text ↑
e1

“the sap bleeding rate, root dry weight and root dry and fresh weights ratio were significantly higher in LT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowering training (LT) gave greater remaining aerial biomass fresh weight than pinching training (PT) in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
lowering training (LT)e0
Outcome
remaining aerial biomass fresh weighte2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
pinching training (PT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowering training (LT) and the pinching training (PT) were used to manage the cucumber plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–420 · show in text ↑
e2

“the remaining aerial biomass fresh weight was significantly greater in the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching training (PT) gave greater individual leaf fresh and dry weights than lowering training (LT) at the middle and upper canopy of cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
middle and upper parts of the plante4
Treatment
pinching training (PT)e0
Outcome
individual leaf fresh and dry weightse3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
lowering training (LT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowering training (LT) and the pinching training (PT) were used to manage the cucumber plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–420 · show in text ↑
e3

“individual leaf fresh and dry weights and the main stem diameter were significantly greater in the PT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1236 · show in text ↑
e4

“at the middle and upper parts of the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching training (PT) gave greater main stem diameter than lowering training (LT) in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pinching training (PT)e0
Outcome
main stem diametere3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
lowering training (LT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowering training (LT) and the pinching training (PT) were used to manage the cucumber plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–420 · show in text ↑
e3

“individual leaf fresh and dry weights and the main stem diameter were significantly greater in the PT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1236 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under pinching training, carbohydrates were apparently diverted to re-establish pinched shoots at the expense of root production in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Compound
carbohydratese5
Outcome
root productione5
Qualifier
more carbohydrates produced by plants were apparently used to re-establish the pinched shootse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
e5

“in the PT treatment, more carbohydrates produced by plants were apparently used to re-establish the pinched shoots at the expense of root production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching the lateral shoots improved biomass production in cucumber, due to sunlight penetration into the canopy.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pinching the lateral shootse6
Outcome
biomass productione6
Direction
improvede6
Qualifier
penetration of sunlight in the plante6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
e6

“after pinching the lateral shoots, biomass production was improved due to the penetration of sunlight in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1611 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The LT method is suitable for long-term cucumber cultivation because of its faster sap bleeding rate.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
LT methode7
Outcome
suitable for a long-term cultivatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
e7

“the LT method is suitable for a long-term cultivation due to its faster sap bleeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1785 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

pruning · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.