Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Shoot Pruning and Potassium Application Effect on Cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L.) Seeds Production and Quality

Sri Hartatik; Miftachul Hudah; Sigit Soeparjono; et al.

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract In order to determine the effect of shoot pruning and potassium fertilization on the production and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L) seeds, a factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications was carried out in Arjasa Village, Jember regency, East Java, Indonesia, in 2018. The first factor is shoot pruning which consists of 4 levels i.e. of 6th internode, 8th internode, 10th internode, and 12th internode shoot pruning. The second factor is the potassium fertilization in three levels i.e. 100 kg ha-1, 200 kg ha-1, 300 kg ha-1. Production and quality of seed cucumber was assessed based on fruit weight, number of grain per fruit, percentage of filled grain, 1000 grains weight, seed viability and vigor. The results indicated that was significant different on interactions of two factors effect on physiological ripe fruit weight, grain number and percentage of filled grain. The 8th internode pruning gives best result on physiological ripe fruit weight, seed viability and vigor. Application of potassium at a dose of 300 kgha-1 gives the best results on fruit weight, 1000 grain weight and percentage of filled grain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot pruning and potassium fertilization interacted significantly on ripe fruit weight, grain number and percentage of filled grain in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
shoot pruning and potassium fertilizatione0
Outcome
physiological ripe fruit weight, grain number and percentage of filled graine2
Qualifier
interactions of two factorse2
Setting
Arjasa Village, Jember regency, East Java, Indonesiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of shoot pruning and potassium fertilization on the production and quality of cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L) seeds”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 35–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“carried out in Arjasa Village, Jember regency, East Java, Indonesia, in 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results indicated that was significant different on interactions of two factors effect on physiological ripe fruit weight, grain number and percentage of filled grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 8th internode pruning gave the best cucumber physiological ripe fruit weight, seed viability and vigor.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
8th internode pruninge2
Outcome
physiological ripe fruit weight, seed viability and vigore2
Direction
best resulte2
Setting
Arjasa Village, Jember regency, East Java, Indonesiae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the production and quality of cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L) seeds”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 87–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“carried out in Arjasa Village, Jember regency, East Java, Indonesia, in 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 8th internode pruning gives best result on physiological ripe fruit weight, seed viability and vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium at 300 kg/ha gave the best cucumber fruit weight, 1000 grain weight and percentage of filled grain.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Application of potassium at a dose of 300 kgha-1e2
Outcome
fruit weight, 1000 grain weight and percentage of filled graine2
Direction
best resultse2
Setting
Arjasa Village, Jember regency, East Java, Indonesiae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the production and quality of cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L) seeds”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 87–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“carried out in Arjasa Village, Jember regency, East Java, Indonesia, in 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of potassium at a dose of 300 kgha-1 gives the best results on fruit weight, 1000 grain weight and percentage of filled grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1177 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pruning · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.