Abstract
The experiment was carried out at Agricultural Research Field, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh during the period of March to June 2021, to evaluate the growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. CV: MOHABIR) as influenced by different levels of NPK fertilizer. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The treatments were T0 (no NPK), T1 (N 69 kg ha-1, P2O5 48 kg ha-1 and K2O 75 kg ha-1), T2 (N 69 kg ha-1, P2O5 60 kg ha-1 and K2O 90 kg ha-1), T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1), respectively. Data were recorded from different stages of plant growth on the number of leaves per plant, number of fruits per plant, fruit length, fruit diameter, individual fruit weight, yield per plant and yield per plot. All the recorded parameters were statistically significant (p<0.01). The maximum number of leaves per plant (37.83) was recorded from T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1) whereas the minimum number of leaves per plant (27.92) was obtained from the control T0 (no NPK). Highest number of fruits per plant (11.92), fruit length (16.00 cm), fruit diameter ((4.10 cm), individual fruit weight (167.17 g), weight of fruits per plant (2.00 kg), and yield per hectare (68.35 t/ha) was found in treatment T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1) whereas lowest data recorded from control T0 (no NPK). Observing the results, it can be stated that application of NPK fertilizer @ N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1 for cucumber cultivation gave better growth and yield in the coastal region of Bangladesh. Vol. 9, No. 2, August 2022: 117-123
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
T3 gave the most leaves per plant, 37.83, versus 27.92 in the control.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse1 - Treatment
- T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 37.83e0
- Qualifier
- 27.92e0
- Comparator
- control T0 (no NPK)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum number of leaves per plant (37.83) was recorded from T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1) whereas the minimum number of leaves per plant (27.92) was obtained from the control T0 (no NPK)”
e1“growth and yield of cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced the highest fruit number per plant at 11.92.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse1
- Treatment
- T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)e2
- Outcome
- number of fruits per plante0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 11.92e0
- Comparator
- control T0 (no NPK)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest number of fruits per plant (11.92)”
e1“growth and yield of cucumber”
e2“The maximum number of leaves per plant (37.83) was recorded from T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)”
e3“minimum number of leaves per plant (27.92) was obtained from the control T0 (no NPK)”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced the greatest fruit length at 16.00 cm.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse1
- Treatment
- T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)e2
- Outcome
- fruit lengthe0
- Direction
- Higheste4
- Value
- 16.00 cme0
- Comparator
- control T0 (no NPK)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit length (16.00 cm)”
e1“growth and yield of cucumber”
e2“The maximum number of leaves per plant (37.83) was recorded from T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)”
e3“minimum number of leaves per plant (27.92) was obtained from the control T0 (no NPK)”
e4“Highest”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced the greatest fruit diameter at 4.10 cm.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse1
- Treatment
- T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)e2
- Outcome
- fruit diametere0
- Direction
- Higheste4
- Value
- 4.10 cme0
- Comparator
- control T0 (no NPK)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit diameter ((4.10 cm)”
e1“growth and yield of cucumber”
e2“The maximum number of leaves per plant (37.83) was recorded from T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)”
e3“minimum number of leaves per plant (27.92) was obtained from the control T0 (no NPK)”
e4“Highest”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced the greatest individual fruit weight at 167.17 g.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse1
- Treatment
- T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)e2
- Outcome
- individual fruit weighte0
- Direction
- Higheste4
- Value
- 167.17 ge0
- Comparator
- control T0 (no NPK)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“individual fruit weight (167.17 g)”
e1“growth and yield of cucumber”
e2“The maximum number of leaves per plant (37.83) was recorded from T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)”
e3“minimum number of leaves per plant (27.92) was obtained from the control T0 (no NPK)”
e4“Highest”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced the greatest fruit weight per plant at 2.00 kg.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse1
- Treatment
- T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)e2
- Outcome
- weight of fruits per plante0
- Direction
- Higheste4
- Value
- 2.00 kge0
- Comparator
- control T0 (no NPK)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“weight of fruits per plant (2.00 kg)”
e1“growth and yield of cucumber”
e2“The maximum number of leaves per plant (37.83) was recorded from T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)”
e3“minimum number of leaves per plant (27.92) was obtained from the control T0 (no NPK)”
e4“Highest”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced the greatest yield per hectare at 68.35 t/ha.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse1
- Treatment
- T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)e2
- Outcome
- yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- Higheste4
- Value
- 68.35 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control T0 (no NPK)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield per hectare (68.35 t/ha)”
e1“growth and yield of cucumber”
e2“The maximum number of leaves per plant (37.83) was recorded from T3 (N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1)”
e3“minimum number of leaves per plant (27.92) was obtained from the control T0 (no NPK)”
e4“Highest”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend N 92, P2O5 72 and K2O 105 kg/ha for better cucumber growth and yield.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- NPK fertilizer @ N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- better growth and yielde0
- Setting
- coastal region of Bangladeshe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of NPK fertilizer @ N 92 kg ha-1, P2O5 72 kg ha-1 and K2O 105 kg ha-1 for cucumber cultivation gave better growth and yield in the coastal region of Bangladesh”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →potassium · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.