Paper · 2022 · Plants

Exploring the Plant Growth-Promotion of Four Streptomyces Strains from Rhizosphere Soil to Enhance Cucumber Growth and Yield

Ayman F. Omar; Adil H. A. Abdelmageed; Ahmad Al-Turki; et al.

16
claims
36
verbatim quotes
66
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The genus Streptomyces is the most abundant and essential microbes in the soil microbial community. Streptomyces are familiar and have great potential to produce a large variety of bioactive compounds. This genus considers an efficient biofertilizer based on its plant growth-promoting activities. Based on their ability to produce a wide varieties of bioactive molecules, the present study aimed to explore the potential plant growth promotion of four Streptomyces strains and their role in enhancing cucumber growth and yield under greenhouse conditions. Streptomyces sp. strain HM2, Streptomyces thinghirensis strain HM3, Streptomyces sp. strain HM8, and Streptomyces tricolor strain HM10 were chosen for the current study. Plant growth-promoting (PGP) features, i.e., indole acetic acid (IAA) production, siderophore excretion, and solubilizing phosphate, were evaluated in vitro. All four strains produced IAA, siderophore, and immobilized inorganic phosphate. Following 4 days of incubation at 30 °C, strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively). At the same time, P solubilization efficacy scored 64.3%, 84.4%, 57.2%, and 81.6% with the same frequency. During in planta evaluation, selected Streptomyces strains combined with rock phosphate were assessed as biofertilizers on the growth and yield of cucumber plants. Under all treatments, positive and significant differences in studied traits were manifested except dry stem matter (SDM), net assimilation rate (NAR), relative growth rate (RGR), and fruit firmness (FF). Treatment T4 (rock phosphate + strain HM3) followed by T5 (rock phosphate + strain HM8) revealed the best results for plant height (PH), number of leaves per plant (NLPP), root length (RL), number of fruits per plant (NFPP), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit fresh weight per plant (FFWPP), soil P (SP) after 21 DAT, and soil P at the end of the experiment. Notably, T6 (rock phosphate + strain HM10) caused a considerable increase in leaf area (LA). Plant growth-promoting bacteria enhance plant growth and yield through phosphorus solubilizing, improve nutrient availability, produce phytohormones, and support plant growth under abiotic stress. These features are important for sustainable agriculture and reducing environmental pollution with chemical fertilizers and pesticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM2 produced 18 µg/mL IAA in vitro.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM2e0symbiont
Outcome
IAAe0
Value
18e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM2 produced siderophores at 42.59% SU in vitro.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM2e0symbiont
Outcome
siderophorese0
Value
42.59e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM2 had P solubilization efficacy of 64.3%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM2e1symbiont
Outcome
P solubilization efficacye0
Value
64.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P solubilization efficacy scored 64.3%, 84.4%, 57.2%, and 81.6% with the same frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM3 produced 22 µg/mL IAA in vitro.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM3e0symbiont
Outcome
IAAe0
Value
22e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM3 produced siderophores at 40.01% SU in vitro.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM3e0symbiont
Outcome
siderophorese0
Value
40.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM3 had P solubilization efficacy of 84.4%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM3e1symbiont
Outcome
P solubilization efficacye0
Value
84.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P solubilization efficacy scored 64.3%, 84.4%, 57.2%, and 81.6% with the same frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM8 produced 62 µg/mL IAA in vitro.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM8e0symbiont
Outcome
IAAe0
Value
62e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM8 produced siderophores at 16.84% SU in vitro.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM8e0symbiont
Outcome
siderophorese0
Value
16.84e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM8 had P solubilization efficacy of 57.2%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM8e1symbiont
Outcome
P solubilization efficacye0
Value
57.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P solubilization efficacy scored 64.3%, 84.4%, 57.2%, and 81.6% with the same frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM10 produced 146 µg/mL IAA in vitro.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM10e0symbiont
Outcome
IAAe0
Value
146 µg/mLe0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM10 produced siderophores at 64.14% SU in vitro.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM10e0symbiont
Outcome
siderophorese0
Value
64.14e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts of IAA (18, 22, 62, and 146 µg/mL, respectively) and siderophores (42.59, 40.01, 16.84, 64.14% SU, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain HM10 had P solubilization efficacy of 81.6%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
HM10e1symbiont
Outcome
P solubilization efficacye0
Value
81.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P solubilization efficacy scored 64.3%, 84.4%, 57.2%, and 81.6% with the same frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“strains HM2, HM3, HM8, and HM10 produced copious amounts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested treatments improved studied cucumber traits significantly, except dry stem matter, net assimilation rate, relative growth rate and fruit firmness.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
studied traitse0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
except dry stem matter (SDM), net assimilation rate (NAR), relative growth rate (RGR), and fruit firmness (FF)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under all treatments, positive and significant differences in studied traits were manifested except dry stem matter (SDM), net assimilation rate (NAR), relative growth rate (RGR), and fruit firmness (FF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate with strain HM3 gave the best cucumber growth and fruit results.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
rock phosphate + strain HM3e0
Interactor
strain HM3e0symbiont
Outcome
plant height (PH), number of leaves per plant (NLPP), root length (RL)e0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
T5 (rock phosphate + strain HM8)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T4 (rock phosphate + strain HM3) followed by T5 (rock phosphate + strain HM8) revealed the best results for plant height (PH), number of leaves per plant (NLPP), root length (RL), number of fruits per plant (NFPP), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit fresh weight per plant (FFWPP), soil P (SP) after 21 DAT, and soil P at the end of the experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–2023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate with strain HM8 ranked second for cucumber growth and fruit results.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
rock phosphate + strain HM8e0
Interactor
strain HM8e0symbiont
Outcome
number of fruits per plant (NFPP), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD)e0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
T4 (rock phosphate + strain HM3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T4 (rock phosphate + strain HM3) followed by T5 (rock phosphate + strain HM8) revealed the best results for plant height (PH), number of leaves per plant (NLPP), root length (RL), number of fruits per plant (NFPP), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), fruit fresh weight per plant (FFWPP), soil P (SP) after 21 DAT, and soil P at the end of the experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–2023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate with strain HM10 considerably increased cucumber leaf area.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
rock phosphate + strain HM10e0
Interactor
strain HM10e0symbiont
Outcome
leaf area (LA)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T6 (rock phosphate + strain HM10) caused a considerable increase in leaf area (LA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2033–2115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.