Paper · 2016 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

The effect of naphthenic acids (NAs) on the response of ‘Golden Delicious’ and ‘Fuji’ apple trees on chemical thinning with NAA

Z. Keserović; Biserka Milić; S. Kevrešan; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

NAA (α-naphthylacetic acid) thins apple fruits inconsistently regarding fruit set and weight and may cause small or misshapen fruits occurrence. Considering hormonal activity, surfactant properties and the impact of naphthenic acids (NAs) on the metabo-lism of auxins in plant tissue, it is assumed that thinning response and fruit size could be improved by adding NAs to NAA for chemical thinning of apple. The purpose of the re-search was to evaluate thinning efficacy of the mixture of NAA and NAs in two commer-cially grown apple cultivars, ‘Golden Delicious’ and ‘Fuji’, known to respond differently to the application of NAA. The following treatments were applied during a three-year pe-riod, from 2010 to 2012: 10 mg∙L-1 NAA, 10 mg∙L-1 NAA + 1.56 mg∙L-1 NAs, 20 mg∙L-1 NAA, 20 mg∙L-1 NAA + 3.12 mg∙L-1 NAs and an untreated control. The addition of NAs to NAA did not alter the effectiveness of NAA in reducing fruit set, while it significantly increased fruit weight compared to NAA applied alone in two of three years of the exper-iment. NAs modulated the effect of NAA on fruit weight of apple cultivar ‘Fuji’ by re-tarding fruit growth and causing a higher number of small fruits to occur compared to NAA applied alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding NAs did not alter NAA reduction of fruit set.

Treatment
addition of NAs to NAAe0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
did not altere0
Comparator
NAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of NAs to NAA did not alter the effectiveness of NAA in reducing fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding NAs increased fruit weight versus NAA alone in two of three years.

Treatment
addition of NAs to NAAe1
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
two of three yearse0
Comparator
NAA applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it significantly increased fruit weight compared to NAA applied alone in two of three years of the exper-iment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition of NAs to NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Fuji, NAs with NAA retarded fruit growth versus NAA alone.

Material
‘Fuji’e0
Treatment
NAse0
Outcome
fruit growthe0
Direction
re-tardinge0
Comparator
NAA applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAs modulated the effect of NAA on fruit weight of apple cultivar ‘Fuji’ by re-tarding fruit growth and causing a higher number of small fruits to occur compared to NAA applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Fuji, NAs with NAA increased the number of small fruits versus NAA alone.

Material
‘Fuji’e0
Treatment
NAse0
Outcome
number of small fruitse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NAA applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAs modulated the effect of NAA on fruit weight of apple cultivar ‘Fuji’ by re-tarding fruit growth and causing a higher number of small fruits to occur compared to NAA applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1228 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

65 papers: 50 positive, 15 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.