Paper · 2006 · Crop Science

Genotypic Variation for Stem Reserves and Mobilization in Wheat: II. Postanthesis Changes in Internode Water‐Soluble Carbohydrates

B. Ehdaie; G. A. Alloush; M. A. Madore; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
164
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grain filling in wheat crops grown in semiarid regions may depend more on stored water‐soluble carbohydrates (WSC) than on current photosynthesis. We evaluated the hypothesis that internode WSC content, specific content (WSC content/internode length), and concentration (WSC content/internode weight) of genotypes affect accumulation and mobilization of stem WSC. Genotypic variation for internode WSC‐related traits was measured on the main stem at 10‐d intervals in 11 diverse wheats grown under well‐watered and droughted field conditions across 2 yr. Relationships among internode WSC‐related traits were determined. Date of harvest was the most important factor affecting internode WSC‐related traits followed by genotype, irrigation, and year. Genotype × date of harvest was the most important interaction. Drought reduced WSC content, specific content, and concentration in different internodes, except WSC concentration in peduncles. Mobilized WSC from peduncle, penultimate, and lower internodes ranged from 70 to 244 mg, from 95 to 227 mg, and from 175 to 450 mg, respectively. The lower internodes provided 51% of the stem mobilized WSC. Mobilized WSC was higher in well‐watered than in droughted conditions for penultimate (164 vs. 135 mg) and lower internodes (274 vs. 244 mg). Drought improved mobilization efficiency in the peduncle, penultimate, and lower internodes by 33, 17, and 11%, respectively. Postanthesis maximum WSC content was highly correlated ( r = 0.89 to 0.99) with the amount of WSC mobilized in different internodes, and could be used as a selection criterion to stabilize grain yield under stressful environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest date was the strongest factor for internode WSC traits, followed by genotype, irrigation and year.

Organ / stage
internodee0
Outcome
internode WSC‐related traitse0
Direction
most importante0
Qualifier
Date of harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Date of harvest was the most important factor affecting internode WSC‐related traits followed by genotype, irrigation, and year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by harvest date was the most important interaction for WSC traits.

Outcome
Genotype × date of harveste0
Direction
most importante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype × date of harvest was the most important interaction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced internode WSC content, specific content and concentration, except peduncle concentration.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
WSC content, specific content, and concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
except WSC concentration in pedunclese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought reduced WSC content, specific content, and concentration in different internodes, except WSC concentration in peduncles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mobilized WSC from peduncles ranged from 70 to 244 mg.

Organ / stage
pedunclee0
Outcome
Mobilized WSCe0
Direction
rangede0
Value
70 to 244 mge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mobilized WSC from peduncle, penultimate, and lower internodes ranged from 70 to 244 mg, from 95 to 227 mg, and from 175 to 450 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mobilized WSC from penultimate internodes ranged from 95 to 227 mg.

Organ / stage
penultimatee0
Outcome
Mobilized WSCe0
Direction
rangede0
Value
95 to 227 mge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mobilized WSC from peduncle, penultimate, and lower internodes ranged from 70 to 244 mg, from 95 to 227 mg, and from 175 to 450 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mobilized WSC from lower internodes ranged from 175 to 450 mg.

Organ / stage
lower internodese0
Outcome
Mobilized WSCe0
Direction
rangede0
Value
175 to 450 mge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mobilized WSC from peduncle, penultimate, and lower internodes ranged from 70 to 244 mg, from 95 to 227 mg, and from 175 to 450 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower internodes supplied 51% of mobilized stem WSC.

Organ / stage
lower internodese0
Outcome
stem mobilized WSCe0
Value
51%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower internodes provided 51% of the stem mobilized WSC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Well-watered penultimate internodes mobilized more WSC than droughted ones, 164 versus 135 mg.

Organ / stage
penultimatee0
Treatment
well‐waterede0
Outcome
Mobilized WSCe0
Direction
highere0
Value
164 vs. 135 mge0
Comparator
droughted conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mobilized WSC was higher in well‐watered than in droughted conditions for penultimate (164 vs. 135 mg) and lower internodes (274 vs. 244 mg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Well-watered lower internodes mobilized more WSC than droughted ones, 274 versus 244 mg.

Organ / stage
lower internodese0
Treatment
well‐waterede0
Outcome
Mobilized WSCe0
Direction
highere0
Value
274 vs. 244 mge0
Comparator
droughted conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mobilized WSC was higher in well‐watered than in droughted conditions for penultimate (164 vs. 135 mg) and lower internodes (274 vs. 244 mg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased peduncle mobilization efficiency by 33%.

Organ / stage
pedunclee0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
mobilization efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought improved mobilization efficiency in the peduncle, penultimate, and lower internodes by 33, 17, and 11%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased penultimate internode mobilization efficiency by 17%.

Organ / stage
penultimatee0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
mobilization efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought improved mobilization efficiency in the peduncle, penultimate, and lower internodes by 33, 17, and 11%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased lower internode mobilization efficiency by 11%.

Organ / stage
lower internodese0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
mobilization efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
11%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought improved mobilization efficiency in the peduncle, penultimate, and lower internodes by 33, 17, and 11%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postanthesis maximum WSC content correlated strongly with mobilized WSC, with r from 0.89 to 0.99.

Organ / stage
internodese0
Outcome
amount of WSC mobilizede0
Value
r = 0.89 to 0.99e0
Comparator
Postanthesis maximum WSC contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postanthesis maximum WSC content was highly correlated ( r = 0.89 to 0.99) with the amount of WSC mobilized in different internodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Postanthesis maximum WSC content was proposed as a selection criterion for stable grain yield under stress.

Outcome
selection criterion to stabilize grain yielde0
Qualifier
under stressful environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“could be used as a selection criterion to stabilize grain yield under stressful environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

52 papers: 11 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.